[llvm] r223113 - Add support for ARM modified-immediate assembly syntax.

Eric Christopher echristo at gmail.com
Wed Feb 11 15:53:07 PST 2015


*points at Tim and Jim*

-eric

On Wed Feb 11 2015 at 3:50:19 PM Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote:

> Couldn’t find anything related to tilde or how an expression gets
> evaluated to an immediate in ARM manual. Any authority over ARM assembly
> language?
>
> Steven
>
> On Feb 11, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think the first is to get definite proof on the instruction being legal
> or not.
>
> -eric
>
> On Wed Feb 11 2015 at 3:36:46 PM Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I caught this quite late and this commit can no longer
>> back out cleanly. I also don’t have definite proof for such instruction
>> being legal but it certainly looks fine to me. :)
>> The easy fix might be to remove this error and shrink the value to 32
>> bits, but this error message is actually quite useful.
>>
>>
>> On Feb 11, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> Is it a legal instruction? :)
>>
>> If so, it's been a week, I think we should just revert back to green and
>> add a test that the instruction is assembled properly.
>>
>> -eric
>>
>> On Wed Feb 11 2015 at 2:58:52 PM Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Asiri
>>>
>>> Have you had a chance to look at this problem yet? Since the immediates
>>> are evaluated as int64_t, I cannot see an easy way to fix this. I don’t
>>> think we can allow a false positive for this error message either. Do you
>>> have any solution?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Asiri
>>>
>>> I see this instruction, which I believe is legal, gets an error now:
>>> mvn sp, #(~(0xffffff00))
>>> Can you look at this as well? Thanks!
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Should be fixed in r223366
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> - Asiri
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <
>>> joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:53:21AM -0000, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
>>>> > Author: asiri
>>>> > Date: Tue Dec  2 04:53:20 2014
>>>> > New Revision: 223113
>>>> >
>>>> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=223113&view=rev
>>>> > Log:
>>>> > Add support for ARM modified-immediate assembly syntax.
>>>>
>>>> I see failures like
>>>>
>>>>         adds r3, r0, #(32 * 4)
>>>>
>>>> being rejected now. Can you check if that is your commit?
>>>>
>>>> Joerg
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150211/565b60af/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list