[PATCH] Remove the gc.root's findCustomSafePoints mechanism
Philip Reames
listmail at philipreames.com
Thu Jan 15 13:51:38 PST 2015
Not quite sure what you're asking...
The behaviour of the ErlangGC did not change. It's still using
post-call labels. (Or at least, I didn't *intend* to change it. If I
did, please point it out.) It's just reaching that result through the
(slightly modified) generic codepath.
On 01/15/2015 01:19 PM, Peter Zotov wrote:
> ================
> Comment at: lib/CodeGen/ErlangGC.cpp:59
> @@ -58,3 @@
> - MCSymbol *Label = MBB.getParent()->getContext().CreateTempSymbol();
> - BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::GC_LABEL)).addSym(Label);
> - return Label;
> ----------------
> Do I understand it correctly that the GC_LABEL MI will be inserted elsewhere for this safepoint?
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D7004
>
> EMAIL PREFERENCES
> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>
>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list