[llvm] r225954 - Use the operand vector instead so inline assembly can be validated too

[David Majnemer]

Author: majnemer
Date: Wed Jan 14 00:14:36 2015
New Revision: 225954

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=225954&view=rev
Log:
Use the operand vector instead so inline assembly can be validated too

The buildbots got upset after r225941, this should hopefully fix things.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp?rev=225954&r1=225953&r2=225954&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp Wed Jan 14 00:14:36 2015
@@ -2277,11 +2277,11 @@ bool X86AsmParser::validateInstruction(M
   switch (Inst.getOpcode()) {
   default: return true;
   case X86::INT:
-    if (Inst.getNumOperands() == 0)
-      return true;
-    assert(Inst.getOperand(0).isImm() && "expected immediate");
-    if (Inst.getOperand(0).getImm() > 255) {
-      Error(Ops[1]->getStartLoc(), "interrupt vector must be in range [0-255]");
+    X86Operand &Op = static_cast<X86Operand &>(*Ops[1]);
+    assert(Op.isImm() && "expected immediate");
+    int64_t Res;
+    if (!Op.getImm()->EvaluateAsAbsolute(Res) || Res > 255) {
+      Error(Op.getStartLoc(), "interrupt vector must be in range [0-255]");
       return false;
     }
     return true;