[patch] Change the .ll syntax for comdats and add a syntactic sugar

[David Majnemer]

Thanks Rafael, LGTM.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com
> wrote:

> >> It keeps it nice and terse when possible and we only need to check if
> the
> >> next token after comdat is '(' to see if it is in an explicit comdat
> group.
> >
> > I like it. I will post a patch with it.
>
> llvm and clang patches attached. What do you think?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150106/4c812bd0/attachment.html>