[llvm] r225240 - [PM] Add a collection of no-op analysis passes and switch the new pass

[Chandler Carruth]

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com>
wrote:

> On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm probably weird, but I have two things in my head "No Op" which is
>> just an abbreviation that I would write, well, as I did. Then there is a
>> nop which is a single thing...
>
>
> Wow, I"m even self-inconsistent and have been merrily naming things 'Noop'
> as well. Best part of course is that these things *aren't noops*! Anyways,
> I'm really wondering whether this term is useful at all here....
>
>
> Yeah, I think it might just be the wrong term.
>
> Of your other suggestions I like "stub" the best.  Maybe "empty"?
>

Empty, to me, doesn't convey the degree to which these are synthetic and
not intended for "real" usage. Stub does indicate that nicely...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150105/c884b7bb/attachment.html>