[llvm] r225245 - [PM] Simplify how we use the registry by including it only once. Still
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at gmail.com
Mon Jan 5 20:49:39 PST 2015
Author: chandlerc
Date: Mon Jan 5 22:49:38 2015
New Revision: 225245
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=225245&view=rev
Log:
[PM] Simplify how we use the registry by including it only once. Still
more verbose than I'd like, but the code really isn't that interesting,
and this still seems vastly simpler than any other solutions I've come
up with. =] Maybe if we get to the 10th IR unit, this will be a problem
in practice.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/tools/opt/Passes.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/tools/opt/Passes.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/tools/opt/Passes.cpp?rev=225245&r1=225244&r2=225245&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/tools/opt/Passes.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/tools/opt/Passes.cpp Mon Jan 5 22:49:38 2015
@@ -104,9 +104,6 @@ void llvm::registerFunctionAnalyses(Func
static bool isModulePassName(StringRef Name) {
#define MODULE_PASS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) if (Name == NAME) return true;
-#include "PassRegistry.def"
-
- // We also support building a require pass around any analysis.
#define MODULE_ANALYSIS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) \
if (Name == "require<" NAME ">") \
return true;
@@ -117,9 +114,6 @@ static bool isModulePassName(StringRef N
static bool isCGSCCPassName(StringRef Name) {
#define CGSCC_PASS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) if (Name == NAME) return true;
-#include "PassRegistry.def"
-
- // We also support building a require pass around any analysis.
#define CGSCC_ANALYSIS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) \
if (Name == "require<" NAME ">") \
return true;
@@ -130,9 +124,6 @@ static bool isCGSCCPassName(StringRef Na
static bool isFunctionPassName(StringRef Name) {
#define FUNCTION_PASS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) if (Name == NAME) return true;
-#include "PassRegistry.def"
-
- // We also support building a require pass around any analysis.
#define FUNCTION_ANALYSIS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) \
if (Name == "require<" NAME ">") \
return true;
@@ -147,9 +138,6 @@ static bool parseModulePassName(ModulePa
MPM.addPass(CREATE_PASS); \
return true; \
}
-#include "PassRegistry.def"
-
- // We also support building a require pass around any analysis.
#define MODULE_ANALYSIS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) \
if (Name == "require<" NAME ">") { \
MPM.addPass(NoopAnalysisRequirementPass<decltype(CREATE_PASS)>()); \
@@ -166,9 +154,6 @@ static bool parseCGSCCPassName(CGSCCPass
CGPM.addPass(CREATE_PASS); \
return true; \
}
-#include "PassRegistry.def"
-
- // We also support building a require pass around any analysis.
#define CGSCC_ANALYSIS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) \
if (Name == "require<" NAME ">") { \
CGPM.addPass(NoopAnalysisRequirementPass<decltype(CREATE_PASS)>()); \
@@ -185,9 +170,6 @@ static bool parseFunctionPassName(Functi
FPM.addPass(CREATE_PASS); \
return true; \
}
-#include "PassRegistry.def"
-
- // We also support building a require pass around any analysis.
#define FUNCTION_ANALYSIS(NAME, CREATE_PASS) \
if (Name == "require<" NAME ">") { \
FPM.addPass(NoopAnalysisRequirementPass<decltype(CREATE_PASS)>()); \
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list