[llvm] r223101 - Fix variable used only in assertion.
David Blaikie
dblaikie at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 19:18:58 PST 2014
On Dec 1, 2014 5:10 PM, "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
>
> Author: nicholas
> Date: Mon Dec 1 19:09:56 2014
> New Revision: 223101
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=223101&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix variable used only in assertion.
>
> Modified:
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
> URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp?rev=223101&r1=223100&r2=223101&view=diff
>
==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp Mon Dec 1 19:09:56 2014
> @@ -816,8 +816,9 @@ static void LowerSTATEPOINT(MCStreamer &
> assert(Is64Bit && "Statepoint currently only supports X86-64");
>
> // We need to record the frame size for stack walking
> - const MachineFunction* MF = MI.getParent()->getParent();
> + const MachineFunction *MF = MI.getParent()->getParent();
> assert(MF && "can't find machine function?");
> + (void)MF;
Could we just roll the expression into the assertion? Seems simple enough.
>
> //
> // Emit call instruction
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20141201/21065bbf/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list