[PATCH] R600/SI: Fix sext_inreg problems

[Tom Stellard]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 13, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:44:55PM -0800, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> >> On 11/07/2014 12:17 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> >>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Oct 17, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On Oct 15, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> These fix terrible problems with sext_inreg for 64-bit types
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> <0001-R600-SI-Fix-sext_inreg-in-i64.patch><0002-R600-SI-Add-pattern-for-i64-sext_inreg-i32.patch>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> These are superseded by this patch, plus a piglit test for these
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> <0001-R600-SI-Use-S_BFE_I64-for-64-bit-sext_inreg.patch><sign_extend_inreg.cl>
> >>>> 
> >>>> ping
> >>> ping
> >>> 
> >> ping
> > 
> > Can you rebase this on top of master?
> > 
> > -Tom
> > 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> llvm-commits mailing list
> >> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> 
> Updated version
> 

LGTM.

-Tom