[PATCH] R600/SI: Fix sext_inreg problems

[Tom Stellard]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:44:55PM -0800, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 12:17 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
> >>On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Oct 17, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Oct 15, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>These fix terrible problems with sext_inreg for 64-bit types
> >>>>
> >>>><0001-R600-SI-Fix-sext_inreg-in-i64.patch><0002-R600-SI-Add-pattern-for-i64-sext_inreg-i32.patch>
> >>>
> >>>These are superseded by this patch, plus a piglit test for these
> >>>
> >>><0001-R600-SI-Use-S_BFE_I64-for-64-bit-sext_inreg.patch><sign_extend_inreg.cl>
> >>
> >>ping
> >ping
> >
> ping

Can you rebase this on top of master?

-Tom

> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits