[PATCH] [X86] Fix pattern match for 32-to-64-bit zext in the presence of AssertSext
Michael Kuperstein
michael.m.kuperstein at intel.com
Wed Nov 5 11:51:35 PST 2014
On second thought, I could just get rid of most things after the zext - they were good for the reproducer, but probably not needed for the testcase.
The or before the first trunc is a must as that's what causes the AssertSext to be valid.
I'll try to reduce the testcase and upload a new patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6128
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list