[llvm] r221171 - [Reassociate] Canonicalize negative constants out of expressions.

Chad Rosier mcrosier at codeaurora.org
Wed Nov 5 09:30:19 PST 2014


Thanks for the test case, David, and thanks for reverting, Reed.  I'll
investigate..

> consider the following IR:
> define i64 @f(i64 %add) {
>   %div.i = urem i64 -1, %add
>   %sub = sub i64 -2, %div.i
>   ret i64 %sub
> }
>
> running this with opt -reassociate gives:
> define i64 @f(i64 %add) {
>   %div.i = urem i64 1, %add
>   %sub1 = add i64 %div.i, -2
>   ret i64 %sub1
> }
>
> This will yield different results if %add is 25769803777.
>
> Before we would get 16464041301, now we get 1.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't have a reduction, but I can confirm that reverting this change
>> causes the test to pass.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect that this change has broken some random number generation
>>> tests
>>> in Chromium:
>>>
>>> http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.fyi/builders/Cr%20Win%20Clang%20tester/builds/755
>>>
>>> The LLVM revision window was 221173 to 221166, and this looks like the
>>> most culpable commit. The LLVM changes in that revision window were an
>>> R600
>>> change, yours, my noexcept change, an optnone change, and an
>>> MDNode=>Value
>>> change.
>>>
>>> I'll try to get a reduction.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: mcrosier
>>>> Date: Mon Nov  3 13:11:30 2014
>>>> New Revision: 221171
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=221171&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> [Reassociate] Canonicalize negative constants out of expressions.
>>>>
>>>> This gives CSE/GVN more options to eliminate duplicate expressions.
>>>> This is a follow up patch to http://reviews.llvm.org/D4904.
>>>>
>>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D5363
>>>>
>>>> Added:
>>>>     llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll
>>>> Removed:
>>>>     llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll
>>>> Modified:
>>>>     llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
>>>>     llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp?rev=221171&r1=221170&r2=221171&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp Mon Nov  3
>>>> 13:11:30
>>>> 2014
>>>> @@ -193,9 +193,8 @@ namespace {
>>>>      Value *OptimizeMul(BinaryOperator *I, SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry>
>>>> &Ops);
>>>>      Value *RemoveFactorFromExpression(Value *V, Value *Factor);
>>>>      void EraseInst(Instruction *I);
>>>> -    void optimizeFAddNegExpr(ConstantFP *ConstOperand, Instruction
>>>> *I,
>>>> -                             int OperandNr);
>>>>      void OptimizeInst(Instruction *I);
>>>> +    Instruction *canonicalizeNegConstExpr(Instruction *I);
>>>>    };
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1930,31 +1929,105 @@ void Reassociate::EraseInst(Instruction
>>>>      }
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -void Reassociate::optimizeFAddNegExpr(ConstantFP *ConstOperand,
>>>> Instruction *I,
>>>> -                                      int OperandNr) {
>>>> +// Canonicalize expressions of the following form:
>>>> +//  x + (-Constant * y) -> x - (Constant * y)
>>>> +//  x - (-Constant * y) -> x + (Constant * y)
>>>> +Instruction *Reassociate::canonicalizeNegConstExpr(Instruction *I) {
>>>> +  if (!I->hasOneUse() || I->getType()->isVectorTy())
>>>> +    return nullptr;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Must have at least one constant operand.
>>>> +  Constant *C0 = dyn_cast<Constant>(I->getOperand(0));
>>>> +  Constant *C1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(I->getOperand(1));
>>>> +  if (!C0 && !C1)
>>>> +    return nullptr;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Must be a negative ConstantInt or ConstantFP.
>>>> +  Constant *C = C0 ? C0 : C1;
>>>> +  unsigned ConstIdx = C0 ? 0 : 1;
>>>> +  if (auto *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C)) {
>>>> +    if (!CI->isNegative())
>>>> +      return nullptr;
>>>> +  } else if (auto *CF = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(C)) {
>>>> +    if (!CF->isNegative())
>>>> +      return nullptr;
>>>> +  } else
>>>> +    return nullptr;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // User must be a binary operator with one or more uses.
>>>> +  Instruction *User = I->user_back();
>>>> +  if (!isa<BinaryOperator>(User) || !User->getNumUses())
>>>> +    return nullptr;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Must be a binary operator with higher precedence that add/sub.
>>>> +  switch(I->getOpcode()) {
>>>> +  default:
>>>> +    return nullptr;
>>>> +  case Instruction::Mul:
>>>> +  case Instruction::FMul:
>>>> +  case Instruction::UDiv:
>>>> +  case Instruction::SDiv:
>>>> +  case Instruction::FDiv:
>>>> +  case Instruction::URem:
>>>> +  case Instruction::SRem:
>>>> +  case Instruction::FRem:
>>>> +   break;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  unsigned UserOpcode = User->getOpcode();
>>>> +  if (UserOpcode != Instruction::Add && UserOpcode !=
>>>> Instruction::FAdd
>>>> &&
>>>> +      UserOpcode != Instruction::Sub && UserOpcode !=
>>>> Instruction::FSub)
>>>> +    return nullptr;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Subtraction is not commutative. Explicitly, the following
>>>> transform is
>>>> +  // not valid: (-Constant * y) - x  -> x + (Constant * y)
>>>> +  if (!User->isCommutative() && User->getOperand(1) != I)
>>>> +    return nullptr;
>>>> +
>>>>    // Change the sign of the constant.
>>>> -  APFloat Val = ConstOperand->getValueAPF();
>>>> -  Val.changeSign();
>>>> -  I->setOperand(0, ConstantFP::get(ConstOperand->getContext(), Val));
>>>> -
>>>> -  assert(I->hasOneUse() && "Only a single use can be replaced.");
>>>> -  Instruction *Parent = I->user_back();
>>>> -
>>>> -  Value *OtherOperand = Parent->getOperand(1 - OperandNr);
>>>> -
>>>> -  unsigned Opcode = Parent->getOpcode();
>>>> -  assert(Opcode == Instruction::FAdd ||
>>>> -         (Opcode == Instruction::FSub && Parent->getOperand(1) ==
>>>> I));
>>>> -
>>>> -  BinaryOperator *NI = Opcode == Instruction::FAdd
>>>> -                           ? BinaryOperator::CreateFSub(OtherOperand,
>>>> I)
>>>> -                           : BinaryOperator::CreateFAdd(OtherOperand,
>>>> I);
>>>> -
>>>> NI->setFastMathFlags(cast<FPMathOperator>(Parent)->getFastMathFlags());
>>>> -  NI->insertBefore(Parent);
>>>> -  NI->setName(Parent->getName() + ".repl");
>>>> -  Parent->replaceAllUsesWith(NI);
>>>> +  if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C))
>>>> +    I->setOperand(ConstIdx, ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(),
>>>> -CI->getValue()));
>>>> +  else {
>>>> +    ConstantFP *CF = cast<ConstantFP>(C);
>>>> +    APFloat Val = CF->getValueAPF();
>>>> +    Val.changeSign();
>>>> +    I->setOperand(ConstIdx, ConstantFP::get(CF->getContext(), Val));
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Canonicalize I to RHS to simplify the next bit of logic. E.g.,
>>>> +  // ((-Const*y) + x) -> (x + (-Const*y)).
>>>> +  if (User->getOperand(0) == I && User->isCommutative())
>>>> +    cast<BinaryOperator>(User)->swapOperands();
>>>> +
>>>> +  Value *Op0 = User->getOperand(0);
>>>> +  Value *Op1 = User->getOperand(1);
>>>> +  BinaryOperator *NI;
>>>> +  switch(UserOpcode) {
>>>> +  default:
>>>> +    llvm_unreachable("Unexpected Opcode!");
>>>> +  case Instruction::Add:
>>>> +    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateSub(Op0, Op1);
>>>> +    break;
>>>> +  case Instruction::Sub:
>>>> +    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(Op0, Op1);
>>>> +    break;
>>>> +  case Instruction::FAdd:
>>>> +    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateFSub(Op0, Op1);
>>>> +
>>>> NI->setFastMathFlags(cast<FPMathOperator>(User)->getFastMathFlags());
>>>> +    break;
>>>> +  case Instruction::FSub:
>>>> +    NI = BinaryOperator::CreateFAdd(Op0, Op1);
>>>> +
>>>> NI->setFastMathFlags(cast<FPMathOperator>(User)->getFastMathFlags());
>>>> +    break;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  NI->insertBefore(User);
>>>> +  NI->setName(User->getName());
>>>> +  User->replaceAllUsesWith(NI);
>>>>    NI->setDebugLoc(I->getDebugLoc());
>>>> +  RedoInsts.insert(I);
>>>>    MadeChange = true;
>>>> +  return NI;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  /// OptimizeInst - Inspect and optimize the given instruction. Note
>>>> that erasing
>>>> @@ -1977,6 +2050,10 @@ void Reassociate::OptimizeInst(Instructi
>>>>        I = NI;
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> +  // Canonicalize negative constants out of expressions.
>>>> +  if (Instruction *Res = canonicalizeNegConstExpr(I))
>>>> +    I = Res;
>>>> +
>>>>    // Commute floating point binary operators, to canonicalize the
>>>> order
>>>> of their
>>>>    // operands.  This can potentially expose more CSE opportunities,
>>>> and
>>>> makes
>>>>    // writing other transformations simpler.
>>>> @@ -1997,24 +2074,6 @@ void Reassociate::OptimizeInst(Instructi
>>>>        }
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> -    // Reassociate: x + -ConstantFP * y -> x - ConstantFP * y
>>>> -    // The FMul can also be an FDiv, and FAdd can be a FSub.
>>>> -    if (Opcode == Instruction::FMul || Opcode == Instruction::FDiv) {
>>>> -      if (ConstantFP *LHSConst =
>>>> dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(I->getOperand(0))) {
>>>> -        if (LHSConst->isNegative() && I->hasOneUse()) {
>>>> -          Instruction *Parent = I->user_back();
>>>> -          if (Parent->getOpcode() == Instruction::FAdd) {
>>>> -            if (Parent->getOperand(0) == I)
>>>> -              optimizeFAddNegExpr(LHSConst, I, 0);
>>>> -            else if (Parent->getOperand(1) == I)
>>>> -              optimizeFAddNegExpr(LHSConst, I, 1);
>>>> -          } else if (Parent->getOpcode() == Instruction::FSub)
>>>> -            if (Parent->getOperand(1) == I)
>>>> -              optimizeFAddNegExpr(LHSConst, I, 1);
>>>> -        }
>>>> -      }
>>>> -    }
>>>> -
>>>>      // FIXME: We should commute vector instructions as well.
>>>> However,
>>>> this
>>>>      // requires further analysis to determine the effect on later
>>>> passes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll?rev=221171&r1=221170&r2=221171&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/basictest.ll Mon Nov  3
>>>> 13:11:30 2014
>>>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ define i32 @test14(i32 %X1, i32 %X2) {
>>>>
>>>>  ; CHECK-LABEL: @test14
>>>>  ; CHECK-NEXT: sub i32 %X1, %X2
>>>> -; CHECK-NEXT: mul i32 %tmp, 47
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: mul i32 %B2, 47
>>>>  ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Added:
>>>> llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll?rev=221171&view=auto
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll
>>>> (added)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/canonicalize-neg-const.ll
>>>> Mon
>>>> Nov  3 13:11:30 2014
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
>>>> +; RUN: opt -reassociate -gvn -S < %s | FileCheck %s
>>>> +
>>>> +; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x -
>>>> 0.1234 * y)
>>>> +define double @test1(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test1
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %mul
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double %add{{.*}}, %add{{.*}}
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %mul
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> +  %mul1 = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
>>>> +  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> +  ret double %mul3
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; (x + -0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x - 0.1234 * y) * (x -
>>>> 0.1234 * y)
>>>> +define double @test2(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double %add{{.*}}, %add{{.*}}
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %mul
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> +  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> +  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
>>>> +  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> +  ret double %mul3
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; (x + 0.1234 / y) * (x + -0.1234 / y) -> (x + 0.1234 / y) * (x -
>>>> 0.1234 / y)
>>>> +define double @test3(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test3
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fdiv double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %div
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %div
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double %add{{.*}}, %add{{.*}}
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double
>>>> +
>>>> +  %div = fdiv double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %div, %x
>>>> +  %div1 = fdiv double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %add2 = fadd double %div1, %x
>>>> +  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> +  ret double %mul3
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x +
>>>> 0.1234 * y)
>>>> +define double @test4(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test4
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %mul
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double %add{{.*}}, %add{{.*}}
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = fmul double %y, 1.234000e-01
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> +  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> +  %add2 = fsub double %x, %mul1
>>>> +  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> +  ret double %mul3
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x - -1234 * y)
>>>> +define i64 @test5(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test5
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: mul i64 %y, 1234
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: add i64 %mul, %x
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = mul i64 %y, -1234
>>>> +  %sub = sub i64 %x, %mul
>>>> +  ret i64 %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x - -0.1234 * y)
>>>> +define double @test6(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test6
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %mul
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %sub = fsub double %x, %mul
>>>> +  ret double %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Don't modify (-0.1234 * y - x)
>>>> +define double @test7(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test7
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %mul, %x
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %sub = fsub double %mul, %x
>>>> +  ret double %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (-0.1234 * y + x) -> (x - 0.1234 * y)
>>>> +define double @test8(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test8
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %add
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> +  ret double %add
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (y * -0.1234 + x) -> (x - 0.1234 * y)
>>>> +define double @test9(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test9
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %mul
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %add
>>>> +
>>>> +  %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> +  ret double %add
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x - -1234 udiv y)
>>>> +define i64 @test10(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test10
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: udiv i64 1234, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: add i64 %div, %x
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %div = udiv i64 -1234, %y
>>>> +  %sub = sub i64 %x, %div
>>>> +  ret i64 %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x - -1234 sdiv y)
>>>> +define i64 @test11(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test11
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: sdiv i64 1234, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: add i64 %div, %x
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %div = sdiv i64 -1234, %y
>>>> +  %sub = sub i64 %x, %div
>>>> +  ret i64 %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x - -0.1234 / y)
>>>> +define double @test12(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test12
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fdiv double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %div
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %div = fdiv double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %sub = fsub double %x, %div
>>>> +  ret double %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x - -0.1234 urem y)
>>>> +define i64 @test13(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test13
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: urem i64 1234, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: add i64 %urem, %x
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %urem = urem i64 -1234, %y
>>>> +  %sub = sub i64 %x, %urem
>>>> +  ret i64 %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x + -0.1234 srem y)
>>>> +define i64 @test14(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test14
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: srem i64 1234, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: sub i64 %x, %srem
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %add
>>>> +
>>>> +  %srem = srem i64 -1234, %y
>>>> +  %add = add i64 %x, %srem
>>>> +  ret i64 %add
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Don't modify (-0.1234 srem y - x)
>>>> +define i64 @test15(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test15
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: %srem = srem i64 -1234, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: %sub = sub i64 %srem, %x
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %srem = srem i64 -1234, %y
>>>> +  %sub = sub i64 %srem, %x
>>>> +  ret i64 %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x - -0.1234 frem y)
>>>> +define double @test16(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test16
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: frem double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fadd double %x, %rem
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %sub
>>>> +
>>>> +  %rem = frem double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %sub = fsub double %x, %rem
>>>> +  ret double %sub
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (x + -0.1234 frem y)
>>>> +define double @test17(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test17
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: frem double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %rem
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %add
>>>> +
>>>> +  %rem = frem double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %x, %rem
>>>> +  ret double %add
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +; Canonicalize (-0.1234 frem y + x) -> (x - 0.1234 frem y)
>>>> +define double @test18(double %x, double %y) {
>>>> +; CHECK-LABEL: @test18
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: frem double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: fsub double %x, %rem
>>>> +; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %add
>>>> +
>>>> +  %rem = frem double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> +  %add = fadd double %x, %rem
>>>> +  ret double %add
>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> Removed: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll?rev=221170&view=auto
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/Reassociate/liftsign.ll (removed)
>>>> @@ -1,69 +0,0 @@
>>>> -; RUN: opt -reassociate -gvn -S < %s | FileCheck %s
>>>> -
>>>> -; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x -
>>>> 0.1234 * y)
>>>> -; so CSE can simplify it further
>>>> -define double @lift_sign1(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp
>>>> uwtable {
>>>> -; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign1(
>>>> -  %mul = fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> -  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> -  %mul1 = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> -  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
>>>> -  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %mul1 = fmul double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fadd %mul1, %x
>>>> -; CHECK: %add2.repl = fsub double %x, %mul
>>>> -; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -ret double %mul3
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -; (x + -0.1234 * y) * (x + -0.1234 * y) -> (x - 0.1234 * y) * (x -
>>>> 0.1234 * y)
>>>> -; GVN can then rewrite it even further
>>>> -define double @lift_sign2(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp
>>>> uwtable {
>>>> -; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign2(
>>>> -  %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> -  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> -  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> -  %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
>>>> -  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %mul = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fadd double %mul1, %x
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -; CHECK: %mul = fmul double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> -; CHECK: %add.repl = fsub double %x, %mul
>>>> -; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add.repl, %add.repl
>>>> -  ret double %mul3
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -; (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - -0.1234 * y) -> (x + 0.1234 * y) * (x +
>>>> 0.1234 * y)
>>>> -define double @lift_sign3(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp
>>>> uwtable {
>>>> -; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign3(
>>>> -  %mul = fmul double %y, 1.234000e-01
>>>> -  %add = fadd double %mul, %x
>>>> -  %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> -  %add2 = fsub double %x, %mul1
>>>> -  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %mul1 = fmul double %y, -1.234000e-01
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fsub double %x, %mul1
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add
>>>> -  ret double %mul3
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -; (x + 0.1234 / y) * (x + -0.1234 / y) -> (x + 0.1234 / y) * (x -
>>>> 0.1234 / y)
>>>> -; so CSE can simplify it further
>>>> -define double @lift_sign4(double %x, double %y) nounwind readnone ssp
>>>> uwtable {
>>>> -; CHECK-LABEL: @lift_sign4(
>>>> -  %div = fdiv double 1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> -  %add = fadd double %div, %x
>>>> -  %div1 = fdiv double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> -  %add2 = fadd double %div1, %x
>>>> -  %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %div1 = fdiv double -1.234000e-01, %y
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %add2 = fadd double %div1, %x
>>>> -; CHECK-NOT: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2
>>>> -; CHECK: %add2.repl = fsub double %x, %div
>>>> -; CHECK: %mul3 = fmul double %add, %add2.repl
>>>> -  ret double %mul3
>>>> -}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>>
>





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list