[PATCH] Add CRLF support to LineIterator.
Rafael EspĂndola
rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Sun Nov 2 17:08:31 PST 2014
On 1 November 2014 21:55, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, I'm OK with this... but I wonder what it does to the performance of the line iterator. Hopefully we never care.
If someone does I am happy with trying to write an explicit state
machine for it, I just went with the simplest solution under the
assumption that no one cared.
> I've made a minor suggestion below that should at least make one of the cases quite a bit simpler.
>
> ================
> Comment at: lib/Support/LineIterator.cpp:64-65
> @@ -44,6 +63,4 @@
> // If we're not stripping comments, this is simpler.
> - size_t Blanks = 0;
> - while (Pos[Blanks] == '\n')
> - ++Blanks;
> - Pos += Blanks;
> - LineNumber += Blanks;
> + while (isAtLineEnd(Pos)) {
> + skipLineEnd(Pos);
> + ++LineNumber;
> ----------------
> This suggests that skipLineEnd should return whether it did indeed skip a line end?
Good point. I will attach a new patch.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list