[PATCH] [lsan] [mips] adding support of lsan for mips/mipsel arch

[Dmitry Vyukov]

>>! In D5616#7, @kumarsukhani wrote:
> Few people are also working on 32-bit MSAN and 32-bit TSAN for MIPS.
> can anyone please comment on them, as we don't see i386 implementation of those sanitizers also.

Comment on what exactly?
Generally 32-bit tsan would be nice. But there is obviously a problem with address space size, e.g. currently address range just for traces is larger than whole 32-bit address space. I am also concerned about potential significant increase in code size and complexity.
Discuss design up-front here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/thread-sanitizer

http://reviews.llvm.org/D5616