Code review D5332

[Adrian Prantl]

I added a more prominent link to the document in r219015.

-- adrian

> On Oct 3, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> 
> We do have such a doc: http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html
> 
> It could probably be improved.
> 
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:
> We really should have a “Getting started with arc and phabricator" on http://llvm.org/docs/ ...
> 
> -- adrian
> 
> 
> > On Oct 3, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Justin Hibbits <jrh29 at alumni.cwru.edu> wrote:
> >
> > llvm-commits is on the subscribers list.  I tried putting it on the
> > reviewers list initially, but arc complained but allowed subscribers
> > (I see it in the llvm-commits archive, too). I'll ping the thread
> > directly, though.
> >
> > - Justin
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 23:57:38 -0700
> > David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Doesn't look like the llvm-commits mailing list was ever added to the
> >> reviewers.
> >>
> >> There's a particular quirk/problem with Phabricator reviews in
> >> particular if you don't create them with the mailing list added to
> >> the review on creation, then Phab never sends the proper introductory
> >> mail if you add the mailing list later (the introductory mail is only
> >> sent to those addresses the code review had at its creation).
> >> Generally it's best to cancel a review that ends up in this state
> >> (since you can't get Phab to produce that email) and start a new one.
> >>
> >> Beyond that, the usual recommendation is to 'ping' a review thread
> >> every week or so if it's not received attention. Some people are
> >> busy, etc, this is an easy way to remind them that there's something
> >> to do.
> >>
> >> So, my advice would be: cancel that review, create a new one and be
> >> sure to put all the reviewers and especially the mailing list
> >> (llvm-commits) on the review before you finish creating it. Make sure
> >> that initial mail is sent to (and arrives on) the llvm-commits
> >> mailing list. If there's no respons in a week, post a simple
> >> 'ping' (either via Phab or just reply-all to the original Phab
> >> mailing).
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Justin Hibbits
> >> <jrh29 at alumni.cwru.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can somebody please review http://reviews.llvm.org/D5332?  It's been
> >>> sitting idle for nearly 3 weeks now, and I want to get it in so
> >>> that my other patches can go in: D5399 and D5400 (PowerPC -fpic
> >>> support, and clang changes to support this, respectively).
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Justin
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>