[llvm] r218790 - [X86 disasm tblegen backend] Clean up numPhysicalOperands asserts
Adam Nemet
anemet at apple.com
Wed Oct 1 12:28:11 PDT 2014
Author: anemet
Date: Wed Oct 1 14:28:11 2014
New Revision: 218790
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=218790&view=rev
Log:
[X86 disasm tblegen backend] Clean up numPhysicalOperands asserts
No functionality change intended.
This implements Elena's idea to put the new additionalOperand outside the
switch to cover all cases
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140929/237763.html).
Note only nontrivial change is in MRMSrcMemFrm. This requires an inclusive
interval of [2, 4] because we have prefix-dependent *optional* immediate
operand.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp?rev=218790&r1=218789&r2=218790&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp Wed Oct 1 14:28:11 2014
@@ -541,6 +541,14 @@ void RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionS
// physicalOperandIndex should always be < numPhysicalOperands
unsigned physicalOperandIndex = 0;
+ // Given the set of prefix bits, how many additional operands does the
+ // instruction have?
+ unsigned additionalOperands = 0;
+ if (HasVEX_4V || HasVEX_4VOp3)
+ ++additionalOperands;
+ if (HasEVEX_K)
+ ++additionalOperands;
+
switch (Form) {
default: llvm_unreachable("Unhandled form");
case X86Local::RawFrmSrc:
@@ -575,15 +583,13 @@ void RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionS
break;
case X86Local::MRMDestReg:
// Operand 1 is a register operand in the R/M field.
+ // - In AVX512 there may be a mask operand here -
// Operand 2 is a register operand in the Reg/Opcode field.
// - In AVX, there is a register operand in the VEX.vvvv field here -
// Operand 3 (optional) is an immediate.
- if (HasVEX_4V)
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 3 && numPhysicalOperands <= 4 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMDestRegFrm with VEX_4V");
- else
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 && numPhysicalOperands <= 3 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMDestRegFrm");
+ assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands &&
+ numPhysicalOperands <= 3 + additionalOperands &&
+ "Unexpected number of operands for MRMDestRegFrm");
HANDLE_OPERAND(rmRegister)
@@ -600,12 +606,10 @@ void RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionS
// Operand 2 is a register operand in the Reg/Opcode field.
// - In AVX, there is a register operand in the VEX.vvvv field here -
// Operand 3 (optional) is an immediate.
- if (HasVEX_4V)
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 3 && numPhysicalOperands <= 4 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMDestMemFrm with VEX_4V");
- else
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 && numPhysicalOperands <= 3 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMDestMemFrm");
+ assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands &&
+ numPhysicalOperands <= 3 + additionalOperands &&
+ "Unexpected number of operands for MRMDestMemFrm with VEX_4V");
+
HANDLE_OPERAND(memory)
if (HasEVEX_K)
@@ -626,12 +630,9 @@ void RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionS
// Operand 3 (optional) is an immediate.
// Operand 4 (optional) is an immediate.
- if (HasVEX_4V || HasVEX_4VOp3)
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 3 && numPhysicalOperands <= 5 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcRegFrm with VEX_4V");
- else
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 && numPhysicalOperands <= 4 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcRegFrm");
+ assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands &&
+ numPhysicalOperands <= 4 + additionalOperands &&
+ "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcRegFrm");
HANDLE_OPERAND(roRegister)
@@ -662,12 +663,9 @@ void RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionS
// - In AVX, there is a register operand in the VEX.vvvv field here -
// Operand 3 (optional) is an immediate.
- if (HasVEX_4V || HasVEX_4VOp3)
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 3 && numPhysicalOperands <= 5 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcMemFrm with VEX_4V");
- else
- assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 && numPhysicalOperands <= 3 &&
- "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcMemFrm");
+ assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands &&
+ numPhysicalOperands <= 4 + additionalOperands &&
+ "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcMemFrm");
HANDLE_OPERAND(roRegister)
@@ -700,15 +698,13 @@ void RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionS
case X86Local::MRM5r:
case X86Local::MRM6r:
case X86Local::MRM7r:
- {
- // Operand 1 is a register operand in the R/M field.
- // Operand 2 (optional) is an immediate or relocation.
- // Operand 3 (optional) is an immediate.
- unsigned kOp = (HasEVEX_K) ? 1:0;
- unsigned Op4v = (HasVEX_4V) ? 1:0;
- if (numPhysicalOperands > 3 + kOp + Op4v)
- llvm_unreachable("Unexpected number of operands for MRMnr");
- }
+ // Operand 1 is a register operand in the R/M field.
+ // Operand 2 (optional) is an immediate or relocation.
+ // Operand 3 (optional) is an immediate.
+ assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 0 + additionalOperands &&
+ numPhysicalOperands <= 3 + additionalOperands &&
+ "Unexpected number of operands for MRMnr");
+
if (HasVEX_4V)
HANDLE_OPERAND(vvvvRegister)
@@ -727,15 +723,12 @@ void RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionS
case X86Local::MRM5m:
case X86Local::MRM6m:
case X86Local::MRM7m:
- {
- // Operand 1 is a memory operand (possibly SIB-extended)
- // Operand 2 (optional) is an immediate or relocation.
- unsigned kOp = (HasEVEX_K) ? 1:0;
- unsigned Op4v = (HasVEX_4V) ? 1:0;
- if (numPhysicalOperands < 1 + kOp + Op4v ||
- numPhysicalOperands > 2 + kOp + Op4v)
- llvm_unreachable("Unexpected number of operands for MRMnm");
- }
+ // Operand 1 is a memory operand (possibly SIB-extended)
+ // Operand 2 (optional) is an immediate or relocation.
+ assert(numPhysicalOperands >= 1 + additionalOperands &&
+ numPhysicalOperands <= 2 + additionalOperands &&
+ "Unexpected number of operands for MRMnm");
+
if (HasVEX_4V)
HANDLE_OPERAND(vvvvRegister)
if (HasEVEX_K)
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list