[PATCH] [PATCH] Test case and FastISel fixes with FeatureVSX enabled
Hal Finkel
hfinkel at anl.gov
Thu Sep 25 08:33:49 PDT 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Seurer" <seurer at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: "Bill Schmidt" <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: reviews+D5362+public+ecca475fdb0fc511 at reviews.llvm.org, "Daniel Sanders" <daniel.sanders at imgtec.com>, "reed
> kotler" <rkotler at mips.com>, llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu, "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:21:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Test case and FastISel fixes with FeatureVSX enabled
>
> On 9/22/2014 2:03 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 13:57 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Bill Schmidt" <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>> To: "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: reviews+D5362+public+ecca475fdb0fc511 at reviews.llvm.org,
> >>> seurer at linux.vnet.ibm.com, "Daniel Sanders"
> >>> <daniel.sanders at imgtec.com>, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com>,
> >>> "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>,
> >>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> >>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:50:43 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Test case and FastISel fixes with
> >>> FeatureVSX enabled
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 10:05 -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> >>>>>> How about changing getRegForValue to return 0 if it ends up
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>> a VSX register. All the uses of getRegForValue already check
> >>>>>> for a 0 return value. That moves the code to just one spot
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> there are already multiple checks there for things that
> >>>>>> FastISel can't handle.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Bill,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe this is generally what Eric is suggesting, but
> >>>>> FastISel::getRegForValue() is in the common code, so we have to
> >>>>> change
> >>>>> it in one of the backend-specific calls. There is a call to
> >>>>> TLI.isTypeLegal(VT) in FastISel::getRegForValue() that will
> >>>>> call
> >>>>> into
> >>>>> PPCFastISel.isTypeLegal(). So you can add a check there for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> VSX
> >>>>> register classes and return false for now, and that will take
> >>>>> care of it
> >>>>> everywhere.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Not the register classes, but the types that would lead to those
> >>>> classes. (f128 probably, etc)
> >>>
> >>> Right, I misspoke (with my phalanges). I think you should be
> >>> able to
> >>> just return false when VSX is enabled and VT.isVector() is true.
> >>
> >> And for f64 too. It's that whole 'scalar' part of your
> >> 'vector-scalar extensions' ;)
> >
> > Eh, right. :) Hey, I've been on vacation, I need a couple days to
> > get
> > my head back in the game...
>
> There is a problem in just trying to use PPCFastISel.isTypeLegal().
> There are two places in FastISel::getRegForValue where a register is
> actually gotten. The first place involves the above mentioned call to
> TLI.isTypeLegal(VT) BUT this does not get to PPCFastISel.isTypeLegal
> because it goes into TargetLoweringBase::isTypeLegal instead.
Okay, so generally speaking, there are about 8 places in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FastISel.cpp that call TLI.isTypeLegal (and I see no calls to the FastISel-specific isTypeLegal). Perhaps this should be changed?
-Hal
>
> Changing that (or the PPC version thereof) is probably not a good
> idea.
>
>
> The gory details follow...
>
>
> This is some code (excerpted from fast-isel-load-store.ll) that shows
> the above behavior.
>
> ; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -verify-machineinstrs -fast-isel-abort
> -mtriple=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu -mcpu=pwr7 | FileCheck %s
> --check-prefix=ELF64
>
> @f = global double 3.5, align 8
>
> define double @t6() nounwind uwtable ssp {
> ; ELF64: t6
> %1 = load double* @f, align 8
> ; ELF64: lfd
> %2 = fadd double %1, 1.0
> ; ELF64: fadd
> ret double %2
> }
>
>
> If you run it with -mattr=+vsx it will die. I added an assert in
> PPCFastISel::SelectRet when I was trying to figure out where in a
> some
> test cases it was still getting VSX registers from getRegForValue
> despite my changes to PPCFastISel.isTypeLegal:
>
> unsigned Reg = getRegForValue(RV); // line 1599
>
> if (Reg == 0)
> return false;
> assert((MRI.getRegClass(Reg)->getID() != PPC::VSFRCRegClassID)
> &&
> "!@! WDS: got a VSX register");
>
> and when I run it the PPC isTypeLegal is never called but the
> assertion
> does go off...
>
> (gdb) break PPCFastISel.cpp:258 ...this is PPC isTypeLegal...
> (gdb) run
> llc:
> /home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCFastISel.cpp:1604:
> bool {anonymous}::PPCFastISel::SelectRet(const
> llvm::Instruction*): Assertion `(MRI.getRegClass(Reg)->getID() !=
> PPC::VSFRCRegClassID) && "!@! WDS: got a VSX register
> "' failed.
>
> If I step through what is happening...
>
> (gdb) break PPCFastISel.cpp:1599
> (gdb) run
> 1599 unsigned Reg = getRegForValue(RV);
> (gdb) s
> 167 EVT RealVT = TLI.getValueType(V->getType(),
> /*AllowUnknown=*/true);
> ...stepping a bit...
> 176 if (!TLI.isTypeLegal(VT)) {
> (gdb) s
> ...stepping a bit...
> llvm::TargetLoweringBase::isTypeLegal (this=0x12c903a0, VT=...)
> at
> /home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h:355
> 355 assert(!VT.isSimple() ||
> (gdb) n
> 356 (unsigned)VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy <
> array_lengthof(RegClassForVT));
> (gdb) n
> 357 return VT.isSimple() &&
> RegClassForVT[VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy] != nullptr;
> (gdb) print VT.isSimple()
> $1 = true
> (gdb) print RegClassForVT[VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy]
> $2 = (const llvm::TargetRegisterClass *) 0x12c4cf18
> <llvm::PPC::VSFRCRegClass>
>
> So this isTypeLegal is going to return true. Eventually it gets back
> to
> the following which is what actually allocates the VSX register:
>
> llvm::FastISel::getRegForValue (this=0x12cbc610, V=0x12c8f1c0)
> at
> /home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/FastISel.cpp:194
> 194 return FuncInfo.InitializeRegForValue(V);
> (gdb) finish
> 1599 unsigned Reg = getRegForValue(RV);
> (gdb) print/x $4
> $5 = 0x80000000
> (gdb) finish
> llc:
> /home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCFastISel.cpp:1604:
> bool {anonymous}::PPCFastISel::SelectRet(const
> llvm::Instruction*): Assertion `(MRI.getRegClass(Reg)->getID() !=
> PPC::VSFRCRegClassID) && "!@! WDS: got a VSX register
> "' failed.
>
> So it *is* calling isTypeLegal but just not the FastISel
> PPC-specific
> one. And thus the VSX register allocation slips through.
>
> --
>
> -Bill Seurer
>
>
--
Hal Finkel
Assistant Computational Scientist
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list