[PATCH] [Power] Add a new feature flag for support of the sync instruction

Robin Morisset morisset at google.com
Thu Sep 11 15:48:05 PDT 2014


I did not know that ppc is also supposed to be a generic processor. I can
either add HasSYNC to it, or remove it from generic (and change the broken
tests). Which would you prefer ?

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:

> As I stated, I do not know what the intent of generic is.  But "ppc" is
> also a "generic" 32-bit processor and has the same description otherwise.
> Why do you leave FeatureSYNC off of it?  It seems to my vague understanding
> that they should be the same.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D5316
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140911/07da7899/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list