[PATCH] Add -bare option to llvm-objdump
Kevin Enderby
enderby at apple.com
Wed Sep 10 10:49:40 PDT 2014
FYI, I’m working on hooking up the MCSymbolizer to the Mach-O disassembler. So I have no problem with adding the -bare option now. Though it will take me a bit of time to get it hooked up as well as we use it for darwin’s otool(1) and all the architectures and its functionality. But I don’t think it will take that long to get the basics of the LLVMOpInfoCallback and LLVMSymbolLookupCallback working.
Also I would like to have the -bare option for use with the Mach-O -private-headers printing. As I have a parameter “verbose” to those routines that is currently set as true and I would like them to be !bare instead so I will print raw values as an option.
Kev
On Sep 9, 2014, at 5:54 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's wait until we have a symbolizer before we add a -bare option.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D5279
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list