[llvm] r215841 - BumpPtrAllocator: remove 'no slabs allocated yet' check
Hans Wennborg
hans at hanshq.net
Sun Aug 31 21:29:29 PDT 2014
On 08/31/2014 08:36 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
> <dexonsmith at apple.com <mailto:dexonsmith at apple.com>> wrote:
>
> > On 2014 Aug 17, at 14:31, Hans Wennborg <hans at hanshq.net
> <mailto:hans at hanshq.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Author: hans
> > Date: Sun Aug 17 13:31:18 2014
> > New Revision: 215841
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=215841&view=rev
> > Log:
> > BumpPtrAllocator: remove 'no slabs allocated yet' check
> >
> > We already handle the no-slabs case when checking whether the
> current slab
> > is large enough: if no slabs have been allocated, CurPtr and End
> are both 0.
> > alignPtr(0), will still be 0, and so "if (Ptr + Size <= End)" fails.
>
> I don't think this commit introduces the problem, but isn't the result
> of `Ptr + Size` undefined when `Size` is too big?
>
> Should this be changed to `if (Size <= End - Ptr)`?
Ptr, which we got from calling alignPtr() can point beyond the current
slab, so the End - Ptr operation could be undefined.
> Should check the pre-commit review here, I think I brought this up and
> there was some reason why it didn't make sense to fix it here....
I think the reasoning was that it wouldn't cause problems in practice.
I'd be happy to fix it, but I think that would mean doing the alignment
and bounds check with intptr_t.
- Hans
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list