[PATCH] [X86] Allow atomic operations using immediates to avoid using a register
Robin Morisset
morisset at google.com
Wed Aug 27 14:16:48 PDT 2014
ping, still waiting on someone with knowledge of the X86 backend.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com> wrote:
> Add back the modification to X86CodeEmitter as the Jit resurrected
>
> + an extra comment on the implicitness of the lock prefix before xchg.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4796
>
> Files:
> lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp
> lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td
> lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
> test/CodeGen/X86/atomic_mi.ll
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140827/29ed81f8/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list