[PATCH] Fix PR17239 by changing the semantics of the RemainingArgsClass Option kind

[Reid Kleckner]

>>! In D4899#8, @rafaelauler wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Regarding the generality of this approach, I agree that it seems more that what is needed. However, I ran into a problem when trying to implement a simpler way. Consider the following situation (in my test case):
> 
> clang-cl /link @response.txt /align...(some linker flag)
> 
> If we implement the "null" approach here, we would insert a null after response.txt and would prematurely end which arguments "/link" get. 

It appears we don't need to support "/link @t.rsp".  MSVC doesn't support nested response files, and when cl invokes the linker, it uses a response file. It does not expand response files after /link, so you end up with a nested response file and link.exe errors out because it thinks it's an input file.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4899