[PATCHES] A module inliner pass with a greedy call site queue

[Chandler Carruth]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Yin Ma <yinma at codeaurora.org> wrote:

> Hi Everybody,
>
>
>
> It has been several weeks after I submitted this greedy inliner patch.
> Some people like
>
> and some hesitate. This inliner has shown promising potentials in various
> situations and
>
> default off. I would like to know whether we can merge this into LLVM at
> first so the people
>
> who like it can continue tuning it up? For people who still has question
> about what is the
>
> right inliner, I am about to submit a BOF proposal to discuss this issue
> in the coming LLVM
>
> dev conference.  How do you guys think?
>

I don't think we should merge this until there is some consensus. I think
the BOF is already moving in the right direction to try to find it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140812/e4c8f05b/attachment.html>