[llvm] r215181 - Fix llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/recursive_inlining.ll to use %llc_dwarf.

[Eric Christopher]

Thanks!

-eric

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:24 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote:
> Author: chapuni
> Date: Thu Aug  7 21:24:05 2014
> New Revision: 215181
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=215181&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/recursive_inlining.ll to use %llc_dwarf.
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/recursive_inlining.ll
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/recursive_inlining.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/recursive_inlining.ll?rev=215181&r1=215180&r2=215181&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/recursive_inlining.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/recursive_inlining.ll Thu Aug  7 21:24:05 2014
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  ; REQUIRES: object-emission
>
> -; RUN: llc -filetype=obj -O0 < %s | llvm-dwarfdump -debug-dump=info - | FileCheck %s
> +; RUN: %llc_dwarf -filetype=obj -O0 < %s | llvm-dwarfdump -debug-dump=info - | FileCheck %s
>
>  ; This isn't a very pretty test case - I imagine there might be other ways to
>  ; tickle the optimizers into producing the desired code, but I haven't found
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits