[llvm] r214892 - Optimize vector fabs of bitcasted constant integer values.

[Renato Golin]

On 5 August 2014 20:43, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>> 2. The 'CHECK-NOT' in the ARM cases was requested by Renato. Should the
>> equivalent also go in the X86 tests?
>
> It usually isn't needed when you can just check all of the instructions for
> very small and focused functions (like these).

Yeah, because of the ordering, the idea was to have only a check-not
for the vabs instruction to make sure it was simplified correctly.
Either check-dag for both movs or check-not for vabs would do.

cheers,
--renato