release_35 patches for unroll pragma
Aaron Ballman
aaron.ballman at gmail.com
Mon Aug 4 10:24:58 PDT 2014
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems like the feature missed the boat unless there's a particularly
> compelling reason. We usually do time based releases and not feature
> based.
>
> Any reason that we need them in 3.5? Correctness?
My only concern is that the feature is partially in 3.5, but a
user-facing part of that feature was changed once the freeze happened.
Eg) #pragma clang loop unroll(enable) became #pragma clang loop
unroll(full)
Then again, I don't imagine this is going to get so much use in the
real world that users can't do a simple grep to refactor their code
for the change.
~Aaron
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list