Please avoid git-push style drops of 50+ commits....

[Chandler Carruth]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Justin Holewinski <
justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:

> Alright, I'll figure something out.  Ordinarily, I would commit when
> ready; but for these upstreaming patches there is an approval process that
> acts like a barrier/sync point. :)


Yea, I suspected as much. I don't have any great solution for that process.
Is it possible to send each patch individually through the approval
process? ;]

Often, even when i get a batch of patches built up for whatever reason, by
just submitting each one after I've rebased, fixed conflicts / regressions,
and re-tested things get staged reasonably well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140627/e7f5f974/attachment.html>