[PATCH] Alternative way of representing comdats

[Rafael Espíndola]

> Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>> This (along with the other non-any issues) can probably be handled earlier in the Verifier since we know that ELF only supports any.
> We cannot do this because we don't know if we are targeting COFF vs ELF in the Verifier.

We know that ELF only supports any, so we can (and should) assume COFF
for the other selectors.

Cheers,
Rafael