[Polly] Reduction dependences [V3]

Johannes Doerfert jdoerfert at codeaurora.org
Tue Jun 17 14:17:58 PDT 2014


Small changes to the version before:

  + I found an easier way of computing the privatization dependences.

 + More accurate comment



Since we have the first patch in, tell me what you think about this one J.

 

Best regards,

  Johannes

 

--

 

Johannes Doerfert

Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.

Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
The Linux Foundation

 

From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
[mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Johannes Doerfert
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 3:44 PM
To: 'Tobias Grosser'
Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; 'Sebastian Pop'
Subject: [Polly] Reduction dependences [V2]

 

Hey Tobias,

 

I added the privatization dependences and 3 test cases to the dependency
patch.

Other than that I integrated what we discussed (at least I think I did),
which includes:

                + Reductions are always on if we use non-parallel code
generation

                + I explained how reduction dependences are computed

 

Tell me what you think.

 

Best regards,

  Johannes

 

--

 

Johannes Doerfert

Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.

Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
The Linux Foundation

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140617/ec15c7c4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-Model-statement-wise-reduction-dependences_v3.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 25828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140617/ec15c7c4/attachment.obj>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list