[PATCH] [PECOFF] Support COMDAT associative sections.

Rui Ueyama ruiu at google.com
Thu May 29 10:15:15 PDT 2014


On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:

> Is it OK to rely on dead stripping to remove associative comdat sections
> when the associated data is discarded?  I thought it was possible for the
> user to disable dead stripping, in which case the result will be incorrect,
> and data will be initialized multiple times.
>

Maybe it's OK for now. I'd think we may want to have some type to say to
the Resolver that "do dead strip this thing even if global dead strip
setting is off," but I didn't think hard enough to conclude it's the best
option.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D3946
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140529/44b5bb77/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list