[llvm] r209568 - Implement sext(C1 + C2*X) --> sext(C1) + sext(C2*X) and

Michael Zolotukhin mzolotukhin at apple.com
Sat May 24 01:09:58 PDT 2014


Author: mzolotukhin
Date: Sat May 24 03:09:57 2014
New Revision: 209568

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=209568&view=rev
Log:
Implement sext(C1 + C2*X) --> sext(C1) + sext(C2*X) and
sext{C1,+,C2} --> sext(C1) + sext{0,+,C2} transformation in Scalar
Evolution.

That helps SLP-vectorizer to recognize consecutive loads/stores.

<rdar://problem/14860614>

Added:
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/consecutive-access.ll
Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp?rev=209568&r1=209567&r2=209568&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp Sat May 24 03:09:57 2014
@@ -1201,6 +1201,24 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::getSignExte
       return getTruncateOrSignExtend(X, Ty);
   }
 
+  // sext(C1 + (C2 * x)) --> C1 + sext(C2 * x) if C1 < C2
+  if (auto SA = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Op)) {
+    if (SA->getNumOperands() == 2) {
+      auto SC1 = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(SA->getOperand(0));
+      auto SMul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(SA->getOperand(1));
+      if (SMul && SC1) {
+        if (auto SC2 = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(SMul->getOperand(0))) {
+          APInt C1 = SC1->getValue()->getValue();
+          APInt C2 = SC2->getValue()->getValue();
+          APInt CDiff = C2 - C1;
+          if (C1.isStrictlyPositive() && C2.isStrictlyPositive() &&
+              CDiff.isStrictlyPositive() && C2.isPowerOf2())
+            return getAddExpr(getSignExtendExpr(SC1, Ty),
+                              getSignExtendExpr(SMul, Ty));
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
   // If the input value is a chrec scev, and we can prove that the value
   // did not overflow the old, smaller, value, we can sign extend all of the
   // operands (often constants).  This allows analysis of something like
@@ -1292,6 +1310,23 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::getSignExte
                                L, AR->getNoWrapFlags());
         }
       }
+      // If Start and Step are constants, check if we can apply this
+      // transformation:
+      // sext{C1,+,C2} --> C1 + sext{0,+,C2} if C1 < C2
+      auto SC1 = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Start);
+      auto SC2 = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Step);
+      if (SC1 && SC2) {
+        APInt C1 = SC1->getValue()->getValue();
+        APInt C2 = SC2->getValue()->getValue();
+        APInt CDiff = C2 - C1;
+        if (C1.isStrictlyPositive() && C2.isStrictlyPositive() &&
+            CDiff.isStrictlyPositive() && C2.isPowerOf2()) {
+          Start = getSignExtendExpr(Start, Ty);
+          const SCEV *NewAR = getAddRecExpr(getConstant(AR->getType(), 0), Step,
+                                            L, AR->getNoWrapFlags());
+          return getAddExpr(Start, getSignExtendExpr(NewAR, Ty));
+        }
+      }
     }
 
   // The cast wasn't folded; create an explicit cast node.

Added: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/consecutive-access.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/consecutive-access.ll?rev=209568&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/consecutive-access.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/consecutive-access.ll Sat May 24 03:09:57 2014
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -slp-vectorizer -S | FileCheck %s
+target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.9.0"
+
+ at A = common global [2000 x double] zeroinitializer, align 16
+ at B = common global [2000 x double] zeroinitializer, align 16
+ at C = common global [2000 x float] zeroinitializer, align 16
+ at D = common global [2000 x float] zeroinitializer, align 16
+
+; Currently SCEV isn't smart enough to figure out that accesses
+; A[3*i], A[3*i+1] and A[3*i+2] are consecutive, but in future
+; that would hopefully be fixed. For now, check that this isn't
+; vectorized.
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo_3double
+; CHECK-NOT: x double>
+; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
+define void @foo_3double(i32 %u) #0 {
+entry:
+  %u.addr = alloca i32, align 4
+  store i32 %u, i32* %u.addr, align 4
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %u, 3
+  %idxprom = sext i32 %mul to i64
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @A, i32 0, i64 %idxprom
+  %0 = load double* %arrayidx, align 8
+  %arrayidx4 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @B, i32 0, i64 %idxprom
+  %1 = load double* %arrayidx4, align 8
+  %add5 = fadd double %0, %1
+  store double %add5, double* %arrayidx, align 8
+  %add11 = add nsw i32 %mul, 1
+  %idxprom12 = sext i32 %add11 to i64
+  %arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @A, i32 0, i64 %idxprom12
+  %2 = load double* %arrayidx13, align 8
+  %arrayidx17 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @B, i32 0, i64 %idxprom12
+  %3 = load double* %arrayidx17, align 8
+  %add18 = fadd double %2, %3
+  store double %add18, double* %arrayidx13, align 8
+  %add24 = add nsw i32 %mul, 2
+  %idxprom25 = sext i32 %add24 to i64
+  %arrayidx26 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @A, i32 0, i64 %idxprom25
+  %4 = load double* %arrayidx26, align 8
+  %arrayidx30 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @B, i32 0, i64 %idxprom25
+  %5 = load double* %arrayidx30, align 8
+  %add31 = fadd double %4, %5
+  store double %add31, double* %arrayidx26, align 8
+  ret void
+}
+
+; SCEV should be able to tell that accesses A[C1 + C2*i], A[C1 + C2*i], ...
+; A[C1 + C2*i] are consecutive, if C2 is a power of 2, and C2 > C1 > 0.
+; Thus, the following code should be vectorized.
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo_2double
+; CHECK: x double>
+; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
+define void @foo_2double(i32 %u) #0 {
+entry:
+  %u.addr = alloca i32, align 4
+  store i32 %u, i32* %u.addr, align 4
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %u, 2
+  %idxprom = sext i32 %mul to i64
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @A, i32 0, i64 %idxprom
+  %0 = load double* %arrayidx, align 8
+  %arrayidx4 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @B, i32 0, i64 %idxprom
+  %1 = load double* %arrayidx4, align 8
+  %add5 = fadd double %0, %1
+  store double %add5, double* %arrayidx, align 8
+  %add11 = add nsw i32 %mul, 1
+  %idxprom12 = sext i32 %add11 to i64
+  %arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @A, i32 0, i64 %idxprom12
+  %2 = load double* %arrayidx13, align 8
+  %arrayidx17 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x double]* @B, i32 0, i64 %idxprom12
+  %3 = load double* %arrayidx17, align 8
+  %add18 = fadd double %2, %3
+  store double %add18, double* %arrayidx13, align 8
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Similar to the previous test, but with different datatype.
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo_4float
+; CHECK: x float>
+; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
+define void @foo_4float(i32 %u) #0 {
+entry:
+  %u.addr = alloca i32, align 4
+  store i32 %u, i32* %u.addr, align 4
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %u, 4
+  %idxprom = sext i32 %mul to i64
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @C, i32 0, i64 %idxprom
+  %0 = load float* %arrayidx, align 4
+  %arrayidx4 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @D, i32 0, i64 %idxprom
+  %1 = load float* %arrayidx4, align 4
+  %add5 = fadd float %0, %1
+  store float %add5, float* %arrayidx, align 4
+  %add11 = add nsw i32 %mul, 1
+  %idxprom12 = sext i32 %add11 to i64
+  %arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @C, i32 0, i64 %idxprom12
+  %2 = load float* %arrayidx13, align 4
+  %arrayidx17 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @D, i32 0, i64 %idxprom12
+  %3 = load float* %arrayidx17, align 4
+  %add18 = fadd float %2, %3
+  store float %add18, float* %arrayidx13, align 4
+  %add24 = add nsw i32 %mul, 2
+  %idxprom25 = sext i32 %add24 to i64
+  %arrayidx26 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @C, i32 0, i64 %idxprom25
+  %4 = load float* %arrayidx26, align 4
+  %arrayidx30 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @D, i32 0, i64 %idxprom25
+  %5 = load float* %arrayidx30, align 4
+  %add31 = fadd float %4, %5
+  store float %add31, float* %arrayidx26, align 4
+  %add37 = add nsw i32 %mul, 3
+  %idxprom38 = sext i32 %add37 to i64
+  %arrayidx39 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @C, i32 0, i64 %idxprom38
+  %6 = load float* %arrayidx39, align 4
+  %arrayidx43 = getelementptr inbounds [2000 x float]* @D, i32 0, i64 %idxprom38
+  %7 = load float* %arrayidx43, align 4
+  %add44 = fadd float %6, %7
+  store float %add44, float* %arrayidx39, align 4
+  ret void
+}
+
+; Similar to the previous tests, but now we are dealing with AddRec SCEV.
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo_loop
+; CHECK: x double>
+; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
+define i32 @foo_loop(double* %A, i32 %n) #0 {
+entry:
+  %A.addr = alloca double*, align 8
+  %n.addr = alloca i32, align 4
+  %sum = alloca double, align 8
+  %i = alloca i32, align 4
+  store double* %A, double** %A.addr, align 8
+  store i32 %n, i32* %n.addr, align 4
+  store double 0.000000e+00, double* %sum, align 8
+  store i32 0, i32* %i, align 4
+  %cmp1 = icmp slt i32 0, %n
+  br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
+
+for.body.lr.ph:                                   ; preds = %entry
+  br label %for.body
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body.lr.ph, %for.body
+  %0 = phi i32 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
+  %1 = phi double [ 0.000000e+00, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %add7, %for.body ]
+  %mul = mul nsw i32 %0, 2
+  %idxprom = sext i32 %mul to i64
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %A, i64 %idxprom
+  %2 = load double* %arrayidx, align 8
+  %mul1 = fmul double 7.000000e+00, %2
+  %add = add nsw i32 %mul, 1
+  %idxprom3 = sext i32 %add to i64
+  %arrayidx4 = getelementptr inbounds double* %A, i64 %idxprom3
+  %3 = load double* %arrayidx4, align 8
+  %mul5 = fmul double 7.000000e+00, %3
+  %add6 = fadd double %mul1, %mul5
+  %add7 = fadd double %1, %add6
+  store double %add7, double* %sum, align 8
+  %inc = add nsw i32 %0, 1
+  store i32 %inc, i32* %i, align 4
+  %cmp = icmp slt i32 %inc, %n
+  br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge
+
+for.cond.for.end_crit_edge:                       ; preds = %for.body
+  %split = phi double [ %add7, %for.body ]
+  br label %for.end
+
+for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry
+  %.lcssa = phi double [ %split, %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge ], [ 0.000000e+00, %entry ]
+  %conv = fptosi double %.lcssa to i32
+  ret i32 %conv
+}
+
+attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
+
+!llvm.ident = !{!0}
+
+!0 = metadata !{metadata !"clang version 3.5.0 "}





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list