[PATCH 2/4] SelectionDAG: Expand SELECT_CC to SELECT + SETCC

Pete Cooper peter_cooper at apple.com
Tue May 13 10:04:28 PDT 2014


On May 13, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:

> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 03:53:22PM -0700, Pete Cooper wrote:
>> Hi Tom
>> 
>> Sorry for the late comments.
>> 
>> I can’t speak for the targets themselves but the LegalizeDAG part looks good, with just one comment...
>> On May 5, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> This consolidates code from the Hexagon, R600, and XCore targets.
>>> 
>>> No functionality change intended.
>>> ---
>>> lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp   | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>> lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.cpp | 20 ++------------------
>>> lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h   |  1 -
>>> lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp         | 22 ++++------------------
>>> lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h           |  1 -
>>> lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp     | 13 +------------
>>> lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.h       |  1 -
>>> 7 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
>>> index dac372f..745ed4a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
>>> +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
>>> @@ -3899,8 +3899,23 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node) {
>>>    Tmp2 = Node->getOperand(1);   // RHS
>>>    Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(2);   // True
>>>    Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(3);   // False
>>> +    EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0);
>>>    SDValue CC = Node->getOperand(4);
>>> 
>>> +    // First check if SELECT_CC nodes are legal for this type
>>> +    if (!TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SELECT_CC, VT)) {
>>> +      EVT CmpVT = Tmp1.getValueType();
>>> +      assert(TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SELECT, VT) &&
>>> +             TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SETCC, CmpVT) &&
>> It looks like ExpandNode could handle SETCC being illegal here.  An illegal SETCC will be further expanded to a SELET_CC.  So we may want to remove the SETCC assert if you’re happy that we won’t hit infinite legalization.  I don’t think we will, but its hard to be 100% sure.
>> 
> 
> Hi Pete,
> 
> I think it will lead to an infinite loop if we drop the assert, because
> if the SETCC is lowered to an illegal SELECT_CC, then we will be right
> back here where we started.
It all depends on the type of CCVT.  You may have something like

i32 selectcc = i8 cond, i32 true, i32 false

If you have i8 selectcc legal then you could have safely created the i8 setcc even though its not legal or custom.

Thanks,
Pete
> 
> I did notice a different issue with the patch.  We can't check for
> 
> if (!TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SELECT_CC, VT)) {
> 
> Because we may need to Expand an node that is marked Custom in case the
> target does nothing to the node in its custom lowering function.
> Instead we must use:
> 
> if (TLI.isCondCodeLegal(CCOp, Tmp1.getSimpleValueType()))
> 
> 
> Also, cc'ing code owners in case they have any comments.
> 
> -Tom
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Pete
>>> +             "ISD::SELECT and ISD::SETCC must both be legal in order to expand "
>>> +             "ISD::SELECT_CC");
>>> +      EVT CCVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(*DAG.getContext(), CmpVT);
>>> +      SDValue Cond = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, dl, CCVT, Tmp1, Tmp2, CC);
>>> +      Results.push_back(DAG.getSelect(dl, VT, Cond, Tmp3, Tmp4));
>>> +      break;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    // SELECT_CC is legal, so the condition code must not be.
>>>    bool Legalized = false;
>>>    // Try to legalize by inverting the condition.  This is for targets that
>>>    // might support an ordered version of a condition, but not the unordered
>>> diff --git a/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.cpp
>>> index b8e5d24..aa4e9b5 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.cpp
>>> +++ b/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.cpp
>>> @@ -944,21 +944,6 @@ HexagonTargetLowering::LowerVASTART(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>> }
>>> 
>>> SDValue
>>> -HexagonTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>> -  SDValue LHS = Op.getOperand(0);
>>> -  SDValue RHS = Op.getOperand(1);
>>> -  SDValue CC = Op.getOperand(4);
>>> -  SDValue TrueVal = Op.getOperand(2);
>>> -  SDValue FalseVal = Op.getOperand(3);
>>> -  SDLoc dl(Op);
>>> -  SDNode* OpNode = Op.getNode();
>>> -  EVT SVT = OpNode->getValueType(0);
>>> -
>>> -  SDValue Cond = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, dl, MVT::i1, LHS, RHS, CC);
>>> -  return DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, dl, SVT, Cond, TrueVal, FalseVal);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -SDValue
>>> HexagonTargetLowering::LowerConstantPool(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>>  EVT ValTy = Op.getValueType();
>>>  SDLoc dl(Op);
>>> @@ -1341,8 +1326,8 @@ HexagonTargetLowering::HexagonTargetLowering(HexagonTargetMachine
>>>    setOperationAction(ISD::BSWAP, MVT::i64, Expand);
>>> 
>>>    // Lower SELECT_CC to SETCC and SELECT.
>>> -    setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i32,   Custom);
>>> -    setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i64,   Custom);
>>> +    setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i32,   Expand);
>>> +    setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i64,   Expand);
>>> 
>>>    if (QRI->Subtarget.hasV5TOps()) {
>>> 
>>> @@ -1577,7 +1562,6 @@ HexagonTargetLowering::LowerOperation(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>>    case ISD::BR_JT:              return LowerBR_JT(Op, DAG);
>>> 
>>>    case ISD::DYNAMIC_STACKALLOC: return LowerDYNAMIC_STACKALLOC(Op, DAG);
>>> -    case ISD::SELECT_CC:          return LowerSELECT_CC(Op, DAG);
>>>    case ISD::SELECT:             return Op;
>>>    case ISD::INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN: return LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN(Op, DAG);
>>>    case ISD::INLINEASM:          return LowerINLINEASM(Op, DAG);
>>> diff --git a/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h b/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h
>>> index 4f27c27..0ddaf84 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h
>>> +++ b/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonISelLowering.h
>>> @@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ namespace llvm {
>>>                            const SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &OutVals,
>>>                            SDValue Callee) const;
>>> 
>>> -    SDValue LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerFRAMEADDR(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerATOMIC_FENCE(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG& DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerRETURNADDR(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>> diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp
>>> index cacff83..57ac274 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp
>>> +++ b/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp
>>> @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ SITargetLowering::SITargetLowering(TargetMachine &TM) :
>>>  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT, MVT::f64, Promote);
>>>  AddPromotedToType(ISD::SELECT, MVT::f64, MVT::i64);
>>> 
>>> -  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::f32, Custom);
>>> -  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i32, Custom);
>>> -
>>> -  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::Other, Expand);
>>> +  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::f32, Expand);
>>> +  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i32, Expand);
>>> +  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i64, Expand);
>>> +  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::f64, Expand);
>>> 
>>>  setOperationAction(ISD::SETCC, MVT::v2i1, Expand);
>>>  setOperationAction(ISD::SETCC, MVT::v4i1, Expand);
>>> @@ -601,7 +601,6 @@ SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerOperation(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  case ISD::SELECT: return LowerSELECT(Op, DAG);
>>> -  case ISD::SELECT_CC: return LowerSELECT_CC(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::SIGN_EXTEND: return LowerSIGN_EXTEND(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::STORE: return LowerSTORE(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::ANY_EXTEND: // Fall-through
>>> @@ -893,19 +892,6 @@ SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>>  return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MVT::i64, Res);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>> -  SDValue LHS = Op.getOperand(0);
>>> -  SDValue RHS = Op.getOperand(1);
>>> -  SDValue True = Op.getOperand(2);
>>> -  SDValue False = Op.getOperand(3);
>>> -  SDValue CC = Op.getOperand(4);
>>> -  EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
>>> -  SDLoc DL(Op);
>>> -
>>> -  SDValue Cond = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, DL, MVT::i1, LHS, RHS, CC);
>>> -  return DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, DL, VT, Cond, True, False);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerSIGN_EXTEND(SDValue Op,
>>>                                           SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>>  EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
>>> diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h b/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h
>>> index c6eaa81..3253f21 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h
>>> +++ b/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h
>>> @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ class SITargetLowering : public AMDGPUTargetLowering {
>>>                               SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>  SDValue LowerLOAD(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>  SDValue LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>> -  SDValue LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>  SDValue LowerSIGN_EXTEND(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>  SDValue LowerSTORE(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>  SDValue LowerZERO_EXTEND(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>> diff --git a/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp
>>> index 1c52c70..96eebb4 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp
>>> +++ b/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.cpp
>>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ XCoreTargetLowering::XCoreTargetLowering(XCoreTargetMachine &XTM)
>>> 
>>>  // XCore does not have the NodeTypes below.
>>>  setOperationAction(ISD::BR_CC,     MVT::i32,   Expand);
>>> -  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i32,   Custom);
>>> +  setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::i32,   Expand);
>>>  setOperationAction(ISD::ADDC, MVT::i32, Expand);
>>>  setOperationAction(ISD::ADDE, MVT::i32, Expand);
>>>  setOperationAction(ISD::SUBC, MVT::i32, Expand);
>>> @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ LowerOperation(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
>>>  case ISD::BR_JT:              return LowerBR_JT(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::LOAD:               return LowerLOAD(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::STORE:              return LowerSTORE(Op, DAG);
>>> -  case ISD::SELECT_CC:          return LowerSELECT_CC(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::VAARG:              return LowerVAARG(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::VASTART:            return LowerVASTART(Op, DAG);
>>>  case ISD::SMUL_LOHI:          return LowerSMUL_LOHI(Op, DAG);
>>> @@ -259,16 +258,6 @@ void XCoreTargetLowering::ReplaceNodeResults(SDNode *N,
>>> //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
>>> 
>>> SDValue XCoreTargetLowering::
>>> -LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const
>>> -{
>>> -  SDLoc dl(Op);
>>> -  SDValue Cond = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, dl, MVT::i32, Op.getOperand(2),
>>> -                             Op.getOperand(3), Op.getOperand(4));
>>> -  return DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, dl, MVT::i32, Cond, Op.getOperand(0),
>>> -                     Op.getOperand(1));
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -SDValue XCoreTargetLowering::
>>> getGlobalAddressWrapper(SDValue GA, const GlobalValue *GV,
>>>                        SelectionDAG &DAG) const
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.h b/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.h
>>> index 4e662fc..fc8b364 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.h
>>> +++ b/lib/Target/XCore/XCoreISelLowering.h
>>> @@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ namespace llvm {
>>>    SDValue LowerBlockAddress(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerConstantPool(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerBR_JT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>> -    SDValue LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerVAARG(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerVASTART(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>>    SDValue LowerUMUL_LOHI(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
>>> -- 
>>> 1.8.1.5
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> <0001-SelectionDAG-Expand-SELECT_CC-to-SELECT-SETCC.patch>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140513/53c5a28d/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list