[llvm] r208502 - DwarfUnit: Make explicit a limitation/bug in enumeration constant emission.
Adrian Prantl
aprantl at apple.com
Mon May 12 10:28:26 PDT 2014
> On May 11, 2014, at 10:04 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Author: dblaikie
> Date: Sun May 11 12:04:05 2014
> New Revision: 208502
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=208502&view=rev
> Log:
> DwarfUnit: Make explicit a limitation/bug in enumeration constant emission.
>
> Filed as PR19712, LLVM fails to detect the right type of an enum
> constant when a frontend does not provide an underlying type for the
> enumeration type.
>
> Modified:
> llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp?rev=208502&r1=208501&r2=208502&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp Sun May 11 12:04:05 2014
> @@ -748,12 +748,17 @@ void DwarfUnit::addBlockByrefAddress(con
> /// Return true if type encoding is unsigned.
> static bool isUnsignedDIType(DwarfDebug *DD, DIType Ty) {
> DIDerivedType DTy(Ty);
> - if (DTy.isDerivedType())
> - return isUnsignedDIType(DD, DD->resolve(DTy.getTypeDerivedFrom()));
> + if (DTy.isDerivedType()) {
> + if (DIType Deriv = DD->resolve(DTy.getTypeDerivedFrom()))
> + return isUnsignedDIType(DD, Deriv);
> + // FIXME: Enums without a fixed underlying type have unknown signedness
> + // here, leading to incorrectly emitted constants.
> + assert(DTy.getTag() == dwarf::DW_TAG_enumeration_type);
> + return false;
> + }
This should be relaxed to allow other DIDerivedTypes, including DIComposite types.
I’m imagining a world where SROA does not elide debug info, and a function like this:
struct S { int c; };
int foo() {
struct S s = { 42 };
return s.c;
}
Walking the struct members to find their signedness will be fun!
cheers,
adrian
>
> DIBasicType BTy(Ty);
> - if (!BTy.isBasicType())
> - return false;
> + assert(BTy.isBasicType());
> unsigned Encoding = BTy.getEncoding();
> assert(Encoding == dwarf::DW_ATE_unsigned ||
> Encoding == dwarf::DW_ATE_unsigned_char ||
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list