[llvm] r208237 - do not collect undef terms

Hal Finkel hfinkel at anl.gov
Wed May 7 15:00:11 PDT 2014


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org>
> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 4:49:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [llvm] r208237 - do not collect undef terms
> 
> Hal Finkel wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org>
> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > > Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 4:14:08 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [llvm] r208237 - do not collect undef terms
> > > 
> > > Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > > > do not collect undef terms
> > > > 
> > > > Why? What does this affect? (Is there a regression test?)
> > > 
> > > Because we don't know how to delinearize "undef * 8".
> > > Tobi has sent out a .bc file that ICEs without this patch.
> > 
> > He sent it where?
> 
> He sent it to llvm-commits as a reply to "split delinearization pass
> in 3 steps".
> 
> > So there is a regression test in polly for this? Can it be tested
> > as an LLVM regression test?
> 
> Yes, I can try to add it.

Thanks! That would be great.

 -Hal

> 
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 

-- 
Hal Finkel
Assistant Computational Scientist
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list