[PATCH 1/4] R600: Move MIN/MAX matching from LowerOperation() to PerformDAGCombine()

Tom Stellard thomas.stellard at amd.com
Mon May 5 20:17:39 PDT 2014


---
 lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.h   |  2 +-
 lib/Target/R600/R600ISelLowering.cpp   | 12 +++++-------
 lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp     |  6 ------
 test/CodeGen/R600/pv.ll                |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
index 52a500c..b7e959d 100644
--- a/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.cpp
@@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ AMDGPUTargetLowering::AMDGPUTargetLowering(TargetMachine &TM) :
   }
 
   setTargetDAGCombine(ISD::MUL);
+  setTargetDAGCombine(ISD::SELECT_CC);
 }
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@@ -737,16 +738,16 @@ SDValue AMDGPUTargetLowering::LowerIntrinsicLRP(SDValue Op,
 }
 
 /// \brief Generate Min/Max node
-SDValue AMDGPUTargetLowering::LowerMinMax(SDValue Op,
+SDValue AMDGPUTargetLowering::CombineMinMax(SDNode *N,
     SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
-  SDLoc DL(Op);
-  EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
+  SDLoc DL(N);
+  EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
 
-  SDValue LHS = Op.getOperand(0);
-  SDValue RHS = Op.getOperand(1);
-  SDValue True = Op.getOperand(2);
-  SDValue False = Op.getOperand(3);
-  SDValue CC = Op.getOperand(4);
+  SDValue LHS = N->getOperand(0);
+  SDValue RHS = N->getOperand(1);
+  SDValue True = N->getOperand(2);
+  SDValue False = N->getOperand(3);
+  SDValue CC = N->getOperand(4);
 
   if (VT != MVT::f32 ||
       !((LHS == True && RHS == False) || (LHS == False && RHS == True))) {
@@ -793,7 +794,7 @@ SDValue AMDGPUTargetLowering::LowerMinMax(SDValue Op,
   case ISD::SETCC_INVALID:
     llvm_unreachable("Invalid setcc condcode!");
   }
-  return Op;
+  return SDValue();
 }
 
 SDValue AMDGPUTargetLowering::SplitVectorLoad(const SDValue &Op,
@@ -1272,6 +1273,9 @@ SDValue AMDGPUTargetLowering::PerformDAGCombine(SDNode *N,
       simplifyI24(N1, DCI);
       return SDValue();
     }
+    case ISD::SELECT_CC: {
+      return CombineMinMax(N, DAG);
+    }
   }
   return SDValue();
 }
diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.h b/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.h
index 8db476c..4a2dad3 100644
--- a/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.h
+++ b/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelLowering.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ public:
 
   SDValue LowerIntrinsicIABS(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
   SDValue LowerIntrinsicLRP(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
-  SDValue LowerMinMax(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
+  SDValue CombineMinMax(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
   const char* getTargetNodeName(unsigned Opcode) const override;
 
   virtual SDNode *PostISelFolding(MachineSDNode *N,
diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/R600ISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/R600/R600ISelLowering.cpp
index b40cb67..e3bcab0 100644
--- a/lib/Target/R600/R600ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/R600/R600ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -986,13 +986,6 @@ SDValue R600TargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const
     return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, SelectNode);
   }
 
-
-  // Possible Min/Max pattern
-  SDValue MinMax = LowerMinMax(Op, DAG);
-  if (MinMax.getNode()) {
-    return MinMax;
-  }
-
   // If we make it this for it means we have no native instructions to handle
   // this SELECT_CC, so we must lower it.
   SDValue HWTrue, HWFalse;
@@ -1672,6 +1665,11 @@ SDValue R600TargetLowering::PerformDAGCombine(SDNode *N,
   }
 
   case ISD::SELECT_CC: {
+    // Try common optimizations
+    SDValue Ret = AMDGPUTargetLowering::PerformDAGCombine(N, DCI);
+    if (Ret.getNode())
+      return Ret;
+
     // fold selectcc (selectcc x, y, a, b, cc), b, a, b, seteq ->
     //      selectcc x, y, a, b, inv(cc)
     //
diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp
index e6880485..cacff83 100644
--- a/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp
@@ -902,12 +902,6 @@ SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
   EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
   SDLoc DL(Op);
 
-  // Possible Min/Max pattern
-  SDValue MinMax = LowerMinMax(Op, DAG);
-  if (MinMax.getNode()) {
-    return MinMax;
-  }
-
   SDValue Cond = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, DL, MVT::i1, LHS, RHS, CC);
   return DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, DL, VT, Cond, True, False);
 }
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/R600/pv.ll b/test/CodeGen/R600/pv.ll
index 5a930b2..f322bc7 100644
--- a/test/CodeGen/R600/pv.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/R600/pv.ll
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -march=r600 | FileCheck %s
 
 ;CHECK: DOT4 * T{{[0-9]\.W}} (MASKED)
-;CHECK: MAX T{{[0-9].[XYZW]}}, 0.0, PV.X
+;CHECK: MAX T{{[0-9].[XYZW]}}, PV.X, 0.0
 
 define void @main(<4 x float> inreg %reg0, <4 x float> inreg %reg1, <4 x float> inreg %reg2, <4 x float> inreg %reg3, <4 x float> inreg %reg4, <4 x float> inreg %reg5, <4 x float> inreg %reg6, <4 x float> inreg %reg7) #0 {
 main_body:
-- 
1.8.1.5




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list