[PATCH RFC 3/4] R600: Implement iterative algorithm for udivrem
Matt Arsenault
arsenm2 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 25 12:16:31 PDT 2014
On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Jan Vesely <jan.vesely at rutgers.edu> wrote:
> @@ -429,6 +429,56 @@ void AMDGPUTargetLowering::ReplaceNodeResults(SDNode *N,
> Results.push_back(UDIVREM.getValue(1));
> break;
> }
> + case ISD::UDIVREM: {
> +
Why is this in ReplaceNodeResults? i64 is legal for SI, so does this not work for SI for some reason?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140425/5707499e/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list