[PATCH] Inliner: Don't clear tail flags when creating allocas for byval args
Reid Kleckner
rnk at google.com
Fri Apr 18 15:37:52 PDT 2014
- Add tests
- Actually fix the latent bug in tailcallelim, it wasn't fixed yet
Hi chandlerc,
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3403
CHANGE SINCE LAST DIFF
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3403?vs=8586&id=8656#toc
Files:
lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp
test/Transforms/Inline/byval-tail-call.ll
test/Transforms/Inline/2010-05-31-ByvalTailcall.ll
test/Transforms/TailCallElim/basic.ll
Index: lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp
@@ -204,6 +204,15 @@
}
}
+ // If any byval or inalloca args are captured, exit. They are also allocated
+ // in our stack frame.
+ for (Argument &Arg : F.args()) {
+ if (Arg.hasByValOrInAllocaAttr())
+ PointerMayBeCaptured(&Arg, &ACT);
+ if (ACT.Captured)
+ return false;
+ }
+
// Second pass, change any tail recursive calls to loops.
//
// FIXME: The code generator produces really bad code when an 'escaping
Index: lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/Utils/InlineFunction.cpp
@@ -586,15 +586,8 @@
if (CS.isByValArgument(ArgNo)) {
ActualArg = HandleByValArgument(ActualArg, TheCall, CalledFunc, IFI,
CalledFunc->getParamAlignment(ArgNo+1));
-
- // Calls that we inline may use the new alloca, so we need to clear
- // their 'tail' flags if HandleByValArgument introduced a new alloca and
- // the callee has calls.
- if (ActualArg != *AI) {
- MustClearTailCallFlags = true;
+ if (ActualArg != *AI)
ByValInit.push_back(std::make_pair(ActualArg, (Value*) *AI));
- }
-
}
VMap[I] = ActualArg;
Index: test/Transforms/Inline/byval-tail-call.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/Inline/byval-tail-call.ll
+++ test/Transforms/Inline/byval-tail-call.ll
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -tailcallelim -inline -instcombine -dse -S | FileCheck %s
; PR7272
-; When inlining through a byval call site, the inliner creates allocas which may
-; be used by inlined calls, so any inlined calls need to have their 'tail' flags
-; cleared. If not then you can get nastiness like with this testcase, where the
-; (inlined) call to 'ext' in 'foo' was being passed an uninitialized value.
+; Calls that capture byval parameters cannot be marked as tail calls. Other
+; tails that don't capture byval parameters can still be tail calls.
target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32-n8:16:32"
target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu"
@@ -23,3 +21,18 @@
call void @bar(i32* byval %x)
ret void
}
+
+define internal void @qux(i32* byval %x) {
+ call void @ext(i32* %x)
+ tail call void @ext(i32* null)
+ ret void
+}
+define void @frob(i32* %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @frob(
+; CHECK: alloca i32
+; CHECK: {{^ *}}call void @ext(
+; CHECK: tail call void @ext(i32* null)
+; CHECK: ret void
+ tail call void @qux(i32* byval %x)
+ ret void
+}
Index: test/Transforms/TailCallElim/basic.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/TailCallElim/basic.ll
+++ test/Transforms/TailCallElim/basic.ll
@@ -143,3 +143,11 @@
call void @noarg()
ret i32* null
}
+
+; Don't tail call if a byval arg is captured.
+define void @test9(i32* byval %a) {
+; CHECK-LABEL define void @test9(
+; CHECK: {{^ *}}call void @use(
+ call void @use(i32* %x)
+ ret void
+}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D3403.2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3386 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140418/ddcc2220/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list