[PATCH] Add support for a directory argument to llvm-link
Krzysztof Parzyszek
kparzysz at codeaurora.org
Tue Apr 1 10:14:44 PDT 2014
On 3/14/2014 4:09 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>
> I think this is a useful feature to have. Response files force all
> invokers of llvm-link to know how to properly escape response files,
Wouldn't it be useful to instead have an option that specifies a file
with the list of source files? That would eliminate the need for
response files, if the only reason for them was the length of the
command line. This way a user could provide an arbitrary list of input
files, not necessarily a complete directory.
-Krzysztof
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list