[PATCH] Add support for a directory argument to llvm-link

Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at codeaurora.org
Tue Apr 1 10:14:44 PDT 2014


On 3/14/2014 4:09 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>
> I think this is a useful feature to have. Response files force all
> invokers of llvm-link to know how to properly escape response files,

Wouldn't it be useful to instead have an option that specifies a file 
with the list of source files?  That would eliminate the need for 
response files, if the only reason for them was the length of the 
command line.  This way a user could provide an arbitrary list of input 
files, not necessarily a complete directory.

-Krzysztof

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list