[llvm] r205182 - llvm/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-xfail.s: This REQUIRES asserts. Seems it doesn't fail with -Asserts.

[Daniel Sanders]

One of the buildbots detected use of an uninitialized value in MipsAsmParser while processing several of the valid-xfail.s's. I assume it's something to do with that. I'm going to commit a patch soon that rewrites the code concerned so I'm not going to investigate it straight away. We'll see if the problem remains after my commit.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA Takumi
> Sent: 31 March 2014 14:30
> To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: [llvm] r205182 - llvm/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-xfail.s: This
> REQUIRES asserts. Seems it doesn't fail with -Asserts.
> 
> Author: chapuni
> Date: Mon Mar 31 08:30:02 2014
> New Revision: 205182
> 
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=205182&view=rev
> Log:
> llvm/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-xfail.s: This REQUIRES asserts. Seems it
> doesn't fail with -Asserts.
> 
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-xfail.s
> 
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-xfail.s
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-
> project/llvm/trunk/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-
> xfail.s?rev=205182&r1=205181&r2=205182&view=diff
> ==========================================================
> ====================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-xfail.s (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/MC/Mips/mips64r2/valid-xfail.s Mon Mar 31 08:30:02
> +++ 2014
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  # RUN: not llvm-mc %s -triple=mips64-unknown-linux -show-encoding -
> mcpu=mips64r2 | not FileCheck %s  # CHECK-NOT: encoding  # XFAIL: *
> +# REQUIRES: asserts
> 
>  	.set noat
>  	abs.ps	$f22,$f8
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits