[llvm] r204795 - Follow-up to r204790: don't try to emit line tables if there are no functions with DI in the TU

Timur Iskhodzhanov timurrrr at google.com
Wed Mar 26 13:33:16 PDT 2014


1 file/line number entry for a single jmp instruction.


2014-03-27 0:22 GMT+04:00 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>:

> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-03-27 0:14 GMT+04:00 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <
> timurrrr at google.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2014-03-26 19:24 GMT+04:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov
> >> >> <timurrrr at google.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Author: timurrrr
> >> >> > Date: Wed Mar 26 06:24:36 2014
> >> >> > New Revision: 204795
> >> >> >
> >> >> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=204795&view=rev
> >> >> > Log:
> >> >> > Follow-up to r204790: don't try to emit line tables if there are no
> >> >> > functions with DI in the TU
> >> >>
> >> >> Hmm - is there any better way to do this? Should we only be building
> >> >> line tables for those functions with DI? Then we'd just emit line
> >> >> tables if we have any (non-empty) line tables to emit, right?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Is there a handy function available for that? :)
> >> >
> >>
> >> From DwarfDebug::beginFunction:
> >>
> >>   // If there's no debug info for the function we're not going to do
> >> anything.
> >>   if (!MMI->hasDebugInfo())
> >>     return;
> >>
> >>   // Grab the lexical scopes for the function, if we don't have any of
> >> those
> >>   // then we're not going to be able to do anything.
> >>   LScopes.initialize(*MF);
> >>   if (LScopes.empty())
> >>     return;
> >>
> >> -eric
> >
> >
> > This is almost exactly the beginning of
> > WinCodeViewLineTables::beginFunction() as of yesterday :)
> > So yes, I'm aware of this and I do/did use it.
> >
> > However, IIUC it turns out that "if we don't have any [lexical scopes]
> then
> > we're not going to be able to do anything" we still can emit minimal DI
> for
> > a function. [see r204790 + r204791]
>
> Without looking (my backlog is insane) what's the info you're emitting for
> it?
>
> -eric
>
> >
> >> >> I assume these COFF line tables don't actually get referenced from
> any
> >> >> other debug info (since the rest of our info is DWARF), but I've been
> >> >> thinking of cleaning up our other line table handling code a bit so
> >> >> that it's a bit more structured - letting the line table object
> itself
> >> >> decide whether it should be emitted (by virtue of being non-empty)
> and
> >> >> then having line table clients (CUs in DwarfDebug - no analogy for
> >> >> COFF which has no line table client) query the line table to see if
> >> >> it'll be there and attach the DW_AT_stmt_list if there will be a line
> >> >> table.
> >> >>
> >> >> - David
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Added:
> >> >> >     llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/COFF/asan2.ll
> >> >> > Modified:
> >> >> >     llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/WinCodeViewLineTables.cpp
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Modified:
> llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/WinCodeViewLineTables.cpp
> >> >> > URL:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/WinCodeViewLineTables.cpp?rev=204795&r1=204794&r2=204795&view=diff
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> ==============================================================================
> >> >> > --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/WinCodeViewLineTables.cpp
> >> >> > (original)
> >> >> > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/WinCodeViewLineTables.cpp Wed
> >> >> > Mar
> >> >> > 26 06:24:36 2014
> >> >> > @@ -304,11 +304,18 @@ void WinCodeViewLineTables::beginFunctio
> >> >> >    }
> >> >> >  }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -void WinCodeViewLineTables::endFunction(const MachineFunction *) {
> >> >> > +void WinCodeViewLineTables::endFunction(const MachineFunction
> *MF) {
> >> >> >    if (!Asm || !CurFn)  // We haven't created any debug info for
> this
> >> >> > function.
> >> >> >      return;
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -  if (!CurFn->Instrs.empty()) {
> >> >> > +  const Function *GV = MF->getFunction();
> >> >> > +  assert(FnDebugInfo.count(GV) == true);
> >> >>
> >> >> "count == true" seems a bit confusing for a few reasons. Should that
> >> >> be either just "assert(x.count(y))" or "assert(x.count(y) != 0)" (or
> >> >> greater than zero or 1 or whatever). "== true" always reads as
> >> >> weird/redundant to me.
> >> >>
> >> >> > +  assert(CurFn == &FnDebugInfo[GV]);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +  if (CurFn->Instrs.empty()) {
> >> >> > +    FnDebugInfo.erase(GV);
> >> >> > +    VisitedFunctions.pop_back();
> >> >> > +  } else {
> >> >> >      // Define end label for subprogram.
> >> >> >      MCSymbol *FunctionEndSym =
> >> >> > Asm->OutStreamer.getContext().CreateTempSymbol();
> >> >> >      Asm->OutStreamer.EmitLabel(FunctionEndSym);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Added: llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/COFF/asan2.ll
> >> >> > URL:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/COFF/asan2.ll?rev=204795&view=auto
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> ==============================================================================
> >> >> > --- llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/COFF/asan2.ll (added)
> >> >> > +++ llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/COFF/asan2.ll Wed Mar 26 06:24:36
> 2014
> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> >> >> > +; RUN: llc -mcpu=core2 -mtriple=i686-pc-win32 -O0 < %s | FileCheck
> >> >> > --check-prefix=X86 %s
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +; This LL file was generated by running clang on the following
> code
> >> >> > with
> >> >> > +; -fsanitize=address
> >> >> > +; D:\asan.c:
> >> >> > +; 1 unsigned char c = 42;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +; Just make sure we don't try to emit the line table.
> >> >> > +; X86-NOT: .section        .debug$S,"rn"
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +; ModuleID = 'asan.c'
> >> >> > +target datalayout = "e-m:w-p:32:32-i64:64-f80:32-n8:16:32-S32"
> >> >> > +target triple = "i686-pc-win32"
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > + at c = global { i8, [63 x i8] } { i8 42, [63 x i8] zeroinitializer
> },
> >> >> > align 32
> >> >> > + at llvm.global_ctors = appending global [1 x { i32, void ()* }] [{
> >> >> > i32,
> >> >> > void ()* } { i32 1, void ()* @asan.module_ctor }]
> >> >> > + at __asan_gen_ = private constant [7 x i8] c"asan.c\00", align 1
> >> >> > + at __asan_gen_1 = private unnamed_addr constant [2 x i8] c"c\00",
> >> >> > align 1
> >> >> > + at 0 = internal global [1 x { i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32 }] [{
> i32,
> >> >> > i32, i32, i32, i32, i32 } { i32 ptrtoint ({ i8, [63 x i8] }* @c to
> >> >> > i32), i32
> >> >> > 1, i32 64, i32 ptrtoint ([2 x i8]* @__asan_gen_1 to i32), i32
> >> >> > ptrtoint ([7 x
> >> >> > i8]* @__asan_gen_ to i32), i32 0 }]
> >> >> > + at llvm.global_dtors = appending global [1 x { i32, void ()* }] [{
> >> >> > i32,
> >> >> > void ()* } { i32 1, void ()* @asan.module_dtor }]
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +define internal void @asan.module_ctor() {
> >> >> > +  call void @__asan_init_v3()
> >> >> > +  call void @__asan_register_globals(i32 ptrtoint ([1 x { i32,
> i32,
> >> >> > i32, i32, i32, i32 }]* @0 to i32), i32 1)
> >> >> > +  ret void
> >> >> > +}
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +declare void @__asan_init_v3()
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +declare void @__asan_before_dynamic_init(i32)
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +declare void @__asan_after_dynamic_init()
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +declare void @__asan_register_globals(i32, i32)
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +declare void @__asan_unregister_globals(i32, i32)
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +define internal void @asan.module_dtor() {
> >> >> > +  call void @__asan_unregister_globals(i32 ptrtoint ([1 x { i32,
> >> >> > i32,
> >> >> > i32, i32, i32, i32 }]* @0 to i32), i32 1)
> >> >> > +  ret void
> >> >> > +}
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
> >> >> > +!llvm.module.flags = !{!3, !4}
> >> >> > +!llvm.ident = !{!5}
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +!0 = metadata !{i32 786449, metadata !1, i32 12, metadata !"clang
> >> >> > version 3.5.0 ", i1 false, metadata !"", i32 0, metadata !2,
> metadata
> >> >> > !2,
> >> >> > metadata !2, metadata !2, metadata !2, metadata !"", i32 2} ; [
> >> >> > DW_TAG_compile_unit ] [D:\/asan.c] [DW_LANG_C99]
> >> >> > +!1 = metadata !{metadata !"asan.c", metadata !"D:\5C"}
> >> >> > +!2 = metadata !{}
> >> >> > +!3 = metadata !{i32 2, metadata !"Dwarf Version", i32 4}
> >> >> > +!4 = metadata !{i32 1, metadata !"Debug Info Version", i32 1}
> >> >> > +!5 = metadata !{metadata !"clang version 3.5.0 "}
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > llvm-commits mailing list
> >> >> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > llvm-commits mailing list
> >> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140327/841dec1d/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list