[llvm] r203986 - Object/COFF: change data type of SymbolNumber from int16 to uint16.
David Majnemer
david.majnemer at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 00:03:54 PDT 2014
IMAGE_SYM_SECTION_MAX is defined as 0xFEFF which means that the valid range
is from 1 to 65279.
On Sun Mar 16 2014 at 6:51:25 PM, Nico Rieck <nico.rieck at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15.03.2014 01:04, Rui Ueyama wrote:
> > Author: ruiu
> > Date: Fri Mar 14 19:04:08 2014
> > New Revision: 203986
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=203986&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Object/COFF: change data type of SymbolNumber from int16 to uint16.
> >
> > Microsoft PE/COFF Spec clearly states that the field is of signed
> interger
> > type. However, in reality, it's unsigned. If cl.exe needs to create a
> large
> > number of sections for COMDAT sections, it will just create more than
> 32768
> > sections. Handling large section number as negative number is not
> correct.
> > I think this is a spec bug.
> >
> > Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3088
> >
> > Modified:
> > llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h
> > llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/COFF.h
> > llvm/trunk/test/MC/COFF/feat00.s
> > llvm/trunk/test/MC/COFF/weak.s
> > llvm/trunk/tools/llvm-nm/llvm-nm.cpp
>
> No test?
>
> This is also missing a few more spots where checks assume a signed
> section number (in COFFObjectFile::getSymbolType,
> COFFObjectFile::getSymbolSize and llvm-readobj COFFDumper::printSymbol).
>
> These checks shouldn't really be done this way and instead use a helper
> function to determine whether the section number is an index.
>
> -Nico
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140317/6dc9d44f/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list