performance regression on sphereflake

[Rafael Espíndola]

On 18 February 2014 16:37, Gerolf Hoflehner <ghoflehner at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> I’m not using a special FE.  Could you go ahead and revert the fix? It can
> cause a performance regression on some architectures and I have not seen a
> benefit yet.

Are you using clang? This is strange, as the patch synchronized llvm's
string to that used by clang.

I am no ARM expert, so I would like a review from someone with more
experience in it. Renato, what do you think of the patches?

Cheers,
Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 935 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140218/7e1c42a2/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clang.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1314 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140218/7e1c42a2/attachment-0001.bin>