Wanted: Bugfixes for 3.4 branch

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith]

On 2014 Feb 7, at 07:38, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:

> cc'ing Code Owner Nadav
> 
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:05:18PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> [CC:'ed committer as requested]
>> 
>> On 02/06/14 23:34, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> We are going to try to have a 3.4.1 bugfix release at some point in
>>> the future.  If there have been any bug fixes merged to ToT since the
>>> 3.4 release that you would like included in a 3.4.1 release, please
>>> email me and cc the code owner with the commit number, and we will work
>>> on getting the patch merged into the 3.4 branch.
>> 
>> Tom,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for doing this. I helped a bit with getting 3.4 into
>> Gentoo, and one thing we did pretty much immediately was to apply an
>> additional patchset for otherwsie broken vararg handling, which didn't
>> make it into the 3.4.0 release.
>> 
>> The mailing list thread where the fixes didn't make it:
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131216/199116.html
>> 
>> The list of commits is:
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=197503
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=197505
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=197520
>> 
> 
> I think we would want to squash these patches if we merged them into the 3.4
> tree.  Duncan, Nadav what do you think?  Are these patches OK to merge?
> 
> -Tom

Hi Tom, Holger,

I agree that these should go in the release branch.  Varargs are rather
important.  Also, squashing them makes sense.

Cheers,
Duncan

>> The Gentoo bug with all the information in one place, for reference:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497298
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Holger
>>