Improving support for CMake-based applications

[Greg Fitzgerald]

These patches generally look good to me.  Thank you for the detailed
commit messages.  I hope that we can work to get these integrated so
that we can move on to Brad's follow-up patches on clang.  Would it
help move things along if Brad uploaded his patches to Phabricator so
that we can review and merge each patch independently?

http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/

Thanks,
Greg


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
> On 01/31/2014 06:24 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>> Apologies but I've lost track of the situation. What's going on and
>> needs changing on the Makefile side? I'm totally down with looking at
>> and reviewing, just not sure where we are :)
>
> I posted a patch series here:
>
>  http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140120/202622.html
>
> to improve the "LLVMConfig.cmake" file provided to support applications
> using "find_package(LLVM)" with CMake.  Part of the series includes
> teaching the Makefile-based build system to generate and install the
> files needed to do this.  Patches 0007 and 0008 in the above-linked
> post make the needed changes to the Makefile build (the patches do
> depend on preceding patches so cannot be tested in isolation).
>
> This is a step toward resolving PR9321:
>
>  http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9321
>
> by eliminating some of the differences between the files installed
> by the two build systems.
>
> Thanks,
> -Brad
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits