[PATCHES] PR18303: Use appropriate Feature flags for encoding instructions

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Tue Jan 28 12:04:11 PST 2014


>> Updated again at http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/llvm.git — after
>> all, I was responsible for a reasonable proportion of the breakage when
>> you try to apply it to today's tree, since I've been messing with the
>> X86 target.
>
> Wow, thanks for that! I'm afraid we could be stuck in this rebasing loop
> for a while unless we can build consensus that this is the approach we
> want to take and get it committed. I'm not really sure how to make that
> happen.

I concede I'm still finding my way here and calibrating how much I can get
away with... but I think recall any dissent. I think we *do* have
sufficient consensus and if we just fixed the uniquification of the STI --
or showed that the memory usage wasn't a serious concern in practice so it
could reasonably be left as a later optimisation -- I'd be happy with
committing it and waiting to see who shouts at me for it :)
-- 
dwmw2




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list