[Sanitizer] Add rudimentary support for using libbacktrace in symbolizer.
Alexey Samsonov
samsonov at google.com
Thu Jan 16 05:54:55 PST 2014
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:11:16PM -0800, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>> > I've mailed out a patch to the LLVM developer's policy which should
>> > clarify
>> > this. The only thing that would help is for the authors of these three
>> > patches (and the fourth patch I found later) to just email a copy of the
>> > patch to llvm-commits, or if any of you have commit access to directly
>> > commit the patch.
>>
>> Here I'm submitting my contribution to the libbacktrace sanitization
>> patch,
>> which has been posted in
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02338.html
>> Note that Alexey has made quite a few changes to the patch that has been
>> eventually committed as r196875, so is this post sufficient for Alexey
>> to commit again his r196875 change?
I've landed this patch (with some modifications) in r199384.
>
> Just speaking from a policy perspective, yes, this is all we needed. Again,
> very sorry for all the trouble here. =[
--
Alexey Samsonov, MSK
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list