[zorg] r195065 - Now with check-all for the test step.

Dmitri Gribenko gribozavr at gmail.com
Tue Nov 19 17:30:28 PST 2013


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
> Author: gkistanova
> Date: Mon Nov 18 19:01:15 2013
> New Revision: 195065
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=195065&view=rev
> Log:
> Now with check-all for the test step.
>
> Modified:
>     zorg/trunk/zorg/buildbot/builders/ClangAndLLDBuilder.py
>
> Modified: zorg/trunk/zorg/buildbot/builders/ClangAndLLDBuilder.py
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/zorg/trunk/zorg/buildbot/builders/ClangAndLLDBuilder.py?rev=195065&r1=195064&r2=195065&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- zorg/trunk/zorg/buildbot/builders/ClangAndLLDBuilder.py (original)
> +++ zorg/trunk/zorg/buildbot/builders/ClangAndLLDBuilder.py Mon Nov 18 19:01:15 2013
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ def getClangAndLLDBuildFactory(
>
>      # Test everything.
>      f.addStep(LitTestCommand(name="test",
> -                             command=ninjaCommand,
> +                             command=ninjaCommand + ["check-all"],
>                               haltOnFailure=True,
>                               description=["test"],
>                               workdir=llvm_objdir,

Galina,

Is it possible that one of the recent changes causes additional empty
parameters to be passed to ninja?

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/9610/steps/build/logs/stdio

Dmitri

-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list