[zorg][patch] r194758 - Patch by Rick Foos!

[Rick Foos]

Yes, rebasing now.

On 11/15/2013 06:24 PM, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Hello Rick,
>
> Could you rebase the proposed patch against the ToT and send it again, 
> please?
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Rick Foos <rfoos at codeaurora.org 
> <mailto:rfoos at codeaurora.org>> wrote:
>
>     Sorry so slow, bad python day.
>
>     Tested locally with llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast
>     <http://quicbuild02:8015/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast>,
>     and llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-ubuntu-13.04-sanitize-address
>     <http://quicbuild02:8015/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-ubuntu-13.04-sanitize-address>.
>
>     The debian fast builder is running without errors as expected.
>
>     The address sanitizer has one test failure, but this looks like a
>     real fail since it successfully building and running 16K+ tests.
>
>     Happy Friday,
>     Rick Foos
>
>     ---
>     Address sanitizer fails one test.
>
>     1.
>         test
>         <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-ubuntu-13.04-sanitize-address/builds/61/steps/test>
>         test 1 unexpected failures 75 expected failures 45 unsupported
>         tests 16326 expected passes failed ( 5 mins, 38 secs )
>          1. stdio
>             <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-ubuntu-13.04-sanitize-address/builds/61/steps/test/logs/stdio>
>          2. Clang::annotate-deep-statements.cpp
>             <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-ubuntu-13.04-sanitize-address/builds/61/steps/test/logs/Clang%3A%3Aannotate-deep-statements.cpp>
>          3. warnings (15)
>             <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-ubuntu-13.04-sanitize-address/builds/61/steps/test/logs/warnings%20%2815%29>
>
>
>
>     There is a ninjaOptions that contains jobs and loadaverage from
>     **kwargs, or null for existing behavior. Probably not the final
>     answer, but works and doesn't interfere with anyone else.
>
>     If SanitizerOption is none: we update compiler-rt, existing behavior.
>     ---
>
>
>     On 11/15/2013 11:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
>>     On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Rick Foos<rfoos at codeaurora.org>  <mailto:rfoos at codeaurora.org>  wrote:
>>>     Verified with Shankar that compiler-rt, containing asan runtime, cannot be
>>>     built with the compiler on a sanitize run.
>>>
>>>     Changing Option ->SanitizerOption, to skip the compiler-rt step to resolve
>>>     this.
>>     This should work for me.  Thank you!
>>
>>     Dmitri
>>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Rick Foos
>     Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
>


-- 
Rick Foos
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131115/27869cd4/attachment.html>