[PATCH] Fixing a heisenbug where the memory dependence analysis behaves differently with and without -g
Manman Ren
manman.ren at gmail.com
Wed Nov 13 13:49:05 PST 2013
Hi Yunzhong,
A few nits:
In the file name "inst_limits.ll", we prefer "-" instead of "_".
+ // Debug intrinsics don't (and can't) cause dependences.
--> dependencies
I agree with David that you should only need one dbg.value intrinsic to
show the problem.
Thanks for working on this,
Manman
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Yunzhong Gao <
Yunzhong_Gao at playstation.sony.com> wrote:
> I came up with the following test case.
>
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2141
>
> CHANGE SINCE LAST DIFF
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2141?vs=5480&id=5516#toc
>
> Files:
> lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
> test/Transforms/DeadStoreElimination/inst_limits.ll
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131113/55cdc150/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list