[PATCH] Prevent user-supplied libc implementations from premature removal in LTO

[Duncan Exon Smith]

[ping]

On Nov 5, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:

> On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> What if I update the patch to have libLTO check against both TLI and TargetLowering?  It wouldn't provide a new interface, but it seems to solve the problem at hand.
>> 
>> That is probably OK.
> 
> Okay, check this out then.
> 
> <protect-runtime-library-functions.patch>_______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: protect-runtime-library-functions.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6989 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131111/d9998be7/attachment.obj>