[llvm] r194318 - Use something really explicit to test "move semantics" on builds without
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at gmail.com
Fri Nov 8 20:49:27 PST 2013
Author: chandlerc
Date: Fri Nov 8 22:49:27 2013
New Revision: 194318
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=194318&view=rev
Log:
Use something really explicit to test "move semantics" on builds without
r-value references. I still want to test that when we have them,
llvm_move is actually a move.
Have I mentioned that I really want to move to C++11? ;]
Modified:
llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/polymorphic_ptr_test.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/polymorphic_ptr_test.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/polymorphic_ptr_test.cpp?rev=194318&r1=194317&r2=194318&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/polymorphic_ptr_test.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/unittests/ADT/polymorphic_ptr_test.cpp Fri Nov 8 22:49:27 2013
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ TEST(polymorphic_ptr_test, Basic) {
EXPECT_EQ(42, p->x);
polymorphic_ptr<S> p2((llvm_move(p)));
+#if !LLVM_HAS_RVALUE_REFERENCES
+ // 'p' may not have been moved from in C++98, fake it for the test.
+ p2 = p.take();
+#endif
EXPECT_FALSE((bool)p);
EXPECT_TRUE(!p);
EXPECT_TRUE((bool)p2);
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list